Literature DB >> 1583696

Evaluation of protein models by atomic solvation preference.

L Holm1, C Sander.   

Abstract

Important properties of globular proteins, such as the stability of the folded state, depend sensitively on interactions with solvent molecules. An excluded volume approximation to protein-solvent interaction, the solvent contact model, was used to derive atomic solvation preference parameters from a database of known protein structures. The ability of solvation preference to discriminate between correct and incorrect three-dimensional structures for a given sequence, or to identify the correct sequence placement in a given structure, was tested. Backbone co-ordinates were taken from experimentally known structures or hypothetical models and side-chain conformations (in rotamer space) were optimized by an efficient Monte Carlo algorithm using simulated annealing and simple potential functions. Discrimination by solvation preference was very clear between deliberately misfolded and correct globular models as well as between native-like and non-native-like topologies of combinatorially generated myoglobin models. Due to its statistical nature, the evaluation works best on entire protein models, while the identification of incorrect parts of models is more difficult. In one case locally incorrect chain tracing in a crystal structure was identified. The method is computationally fast compared to methods based on surface area calculations and is recommended for use as a diagnostic tool in model building based on sequence similarity, in folding simulations and in protein design.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583696     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)91028-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  51 in total

1.  Free energy determinants of tertiary structure and the evaluation of protein models.

Authors:  D Petrey; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Hydrophobic moments of protein structures: spatially profiling the distribution.

Authors:  B D Silverman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-04-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Protein structure comparison using iterated double dynamic programming.

Authors:  W R Taylor
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Decoys 'R' Us: a database of incorrect conformations to improve protein structure prediction.

Authors:  R Samudrala; M Levitt
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Statistical potentials for fold assessment.

Authors:  Francisco Melo; Roberto Sánchez; Andrej Sali
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Hydrophobicity of transmembrane proteins: spatially profiling the distribution.

Authors:  B David Silverman
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Discrimination of native protein structures using atom-atom contact scoring.

Authors:  Brendan J McConkey; Vladimir Sobolev; Marvin Edelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Self-complementarity within proteins: bridging the gap between binding and folding.

Authors:  Sankar Basu; Dhananjay Bhattacharyya; Rahul Banerjee
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Decoys for docking.

Authors:  Alan P Graves; Ruth Brenk; Brian K Shoichet
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 10.  Advances in homology protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Zhexin Xiang
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.