Literature DB >> 15836004

Penny and pound wise: pharmacoeconomics from a governmental perspective.

Mike F van Oostenbruggen1, Ronald B Jansen, Katja Mur, Huib Kooijman.   

Abstract

Because of growing pressure on the healthcare budget in The Netherlands, appropriate justification of current expenditures and future investments in public healthcare are becoming increasingly important. Therefore, the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport is expanding its use of pharmacoeconomic evaluation in informed reimbursement decision-making of new pharmaceuticals. Since June 2002, pharmaceutical companies have been invited to submit a pharmacoeconomic dossier with their reimbursement applications of innovative drugs. As of January 2005 submission of a pharmacoeconomic dossier is mandatory for all drugs claiming to have therapeutic value. Currently, several European governmental and non-governmental organisations are making efforts to harmonise pharmacoeconomic research guidelines at the EU level. Ultimately, this may facilitate a more efficient way of conducting pharmacoeconomic research and encourage the use of pharmacoeconomic data by national assessment agencies and governments. It is anticipated that international pharmaceutical companies will increasingly invest in pharmacoeconomics while government staff will become more experienced in appraising the dossiers, thus resulting in an upward momentum in the quality and usability of pharmacoeconomic data. From the Dutch government's perspective, the use of pharmacoeconomic evaluation in reimbursement decision-making should offer a true opportunity for pharmaceutical companies to present the added value for money of new drugs. Using pharmacoeconomic data, costs, benefits and effects of pharmaceuticals are increasingly being considered from a societal perspective, thus going beyond the sole consideration of the impact on the pharmaceutical budget.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15836004     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200523030-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  2 in total

1.  Problems with the interpretation of pharmacoeconomic analyses: a review of submissions to the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme.

Authors:  S R Hill; A S Mitchell; D A Henry
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Standardisation of costs: the Dutch Manual for Costing in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Jan B Oostenbrink; Marc A Koopmanschap; Frans F H Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total
  5 in total

1.  QALYs: are they helpful to decision makers?

Authors:  Maurice McGregor; J Jaime Caro
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Public funding of pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands: investigating the effect of evidence, process and context on CVZ decision-making.

Authors:  Karin H Cerri; Martin Knapp; Jose-Luis Fernandez
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07-18

3.  The increasingly complex fourth hurdle for pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Joshua Cohen; Elly Stolk; Maartje Niezen
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  The "health benefit basket" in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Elly A Stolk; Frans F H Rutten
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2005-12

5.  Exploring the value of a Doctor of Philosophy program in Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy Research in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Yazed AlRuthia; Nasser Yahya Al-Washali; Raneem Aljuhani; Ibrahim Sales; Bander Balkhi; Abdlatif Alghaiheb; Azher Arafah; Haya M Almalag; Abdullah Alsultan; Saeed A Alqahtani; Monira Alwhaibi
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.330

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.