Literature DB >> 15834594

Bibliometric analysis of global trends for research productivity in microbiology.

P I Vergidis1, A I Karavasiou, K Paraschakis, I A Bliziotis, M E Falagas.   

Abstract

In order to expand upon the limited literature estimating the quantity and quality of worldwide research production in the field of microbiology, a bibliometric analysis was conducted for the period 1995-2003 using the PubMed and Journal Citation Reports databases. By searching the "microbiology" category of the Journal Citation Reports database, a total of 74 journals were identified that were also included in PubMed. From these journals, a total of 89,527 articles were identified for analysis, and data on the country in which the research originated was available for 88,456 (98.8%) of them. The individual countries were separated into nine world regions. In terms of research production for the period studied, Western Europe exceeded all other world regions, with the USA ranking second. The mean impact factor was highest for the USA at 3.4, while it was 2.8 for Western Europe and 2.4 for the rest of the world combined. The research productivity per unit of expenditure for research and development was higher for Canada and Western Europe than for the USA. The three regions in which research productivity increased the most were Asia, Latin America, and Eastern Europe.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15834594     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-005-1306-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  10 in total

Review 1.  [The impact factor: a factor of impact or the impact of a (sole) factor? The limits of a bibliometric indicator as a candidate for an instrument to evaluate scientific production].

Authors:  G F Gensini; A A Conti
Journal:  Ann Ital Med Int       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun

2.  [Medical-bioscientific databanks and the Impact Factor].

Authors:  G Winkmann; H G Schweim
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2000-09-22       Impact factor: 0.628

3.  Retracted: Changes in the impact factor of anesthesia/critical care journals within the past 10 years.

Authors:  J Boldt; G Haisch; W H Maleck
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.105

4.  Impact factors: facts and myths.

Authors:  G H Whitehouse
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas.

Authors:  E GARFIELD
Journal:  Science       Date:  1955-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Bibliometrics and evaluation of research performance.

Authors:  T Luukkonen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 4.709

7.  Alternative to the Science Citation Index impact factor as an assessment of emergency medicine's scientific contributions.

Authors:  D P Barnaby; E J Gallagher
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research.

Authors:  P O Seglen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-02-15

9.  Publication of European Union research on infectious diseases (1991-2001): a bibliometric evaluation.

Authors:  J M Ramos; F Gutiérrez; M Masía; A Martín-Hidalgo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-02-19       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Impact factors of dermatological journals for 1991 - 2000.

Authors:  G B Jemec
Journal:  BMC Dermatol       Date:  2001-11-01
  10 in total
  23 in total

1.  Worldwide research productivity in the field of spine surgery: a 10-year bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Meiyang Wei; Wanming Wang; Yanfeng Zhuang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Comparison of amount of biomedical research originating from the European Union and the United States.

Authors:  Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Matthew E Falagas
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-07-23

3.  A bibliometric analysis by geographic area of published research in several biomedical fields, 1995-2003.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Argyris S Michalopoulos; Ioannis A Bliziotis; Elpidoforos S Soteriades
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Public health citation patterns: an analysis of the American Journal of Public Health, 2003-2005.

Authors:  Melissa L Rethlefsen; Lisa C Wallis
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-10

5.  A bibliometric overview of infectious diseases research in European countries (2002-2007).

Authors:  J M Ramos; M Masía; S Padilla; F Gutiérrez
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Global development and trend of wind tunnel research from 1991 to 2014: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Ziwei Mo; Hui-Zhen Fu; Yuh-Shan Ho
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 4.223

7.  Ireland's contribution to urology and nephrology research in the new millennium: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  E M O'Connor; G J Nason; M F O'Brien
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 1.568

8.  A bibliometric analysis of childhood immunization research productivity in Africa since the onset of the Expanded Program on Immunization in 1974.

Authors:  Charles S Wiysonge; Olalekan A Uthman; Peter M Ndumbe; Gregory D Hussey
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 8.775

9.  Scientometric trends for coronaviruses and other emerging viral infections.

Authors:  Dima Kagan; Jacob Moran-Gilad; Michael Fire
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  New journal selection for quantitative survey of infectious disease research: application for Asian trend analysis.

Authors:  Hiromi Takahashi-Omoe; Katsuhiko Omoe; Nobuhiko Okabe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.