Literature DB >> 1583445

Transfer across delayed discriminations: evidence regarding the nature of prospective working memory.

P J Urcuioli1, T R Zentall.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained successively either on 2 delayed simple discriminations or on a delayed simple discrimination followed by delayed matching-to-sample. During subsequent transfer tests, the initial stimuli from the 1st task were substituted for those in the 2nd. Performances transferred immediately if both sets of initial stimuli had been associated with the presence versus absence of food on their respective retention tests, and the direction of transfer (positive or negative) depended on whether the substitution involved stimuli with identical or different outcome associates. No transfer was found, however, when the initial stimuli were associated with different patterns of responding but food occurred at the end of every trial. These results are consistent with outcome expectancy mediation but are incompatible with response intention and retrospective coding accounts.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583445     DOI: 10.1037//0097-7403.18.2.154

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  8 in total

1.  Prospective and retrospective timing by pigeons.

Authors:  J Gregor Fetterman; P Richard Killeen
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  A differential-outcome effect in pigeons using spatial hedonically nondifferential outcomes.

Authors:  Andrea M Friedrich; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Memory processes in delayed spatial discriminations: response intentions or response mediation?

Authors:  P J Urcuioli; T B DeMarse
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Evidence for response membership in stimulus classes by pigeons.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; B Max Jones; Karen M Lionello-DeNolf
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) remember future responses in a computerized task.

Authors:  Michael J Beran; Theodore A Evans; Emily D Klein; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2012-04-30

7.  Coding of Stimuli by Animals: Retrospection, Prospection, Episodic Memory and Future Planning.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2010-11-01

8.  Differential outcomes enhance accuracy of delayed matching to sample but not resistance to change.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Ryan D Ward; Corina Jimenez-Gomez; Amy L Odum; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2009-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.