Literature DB >> 15834298

Results of the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) trial by geographical region.

Henry R Black1, William J Elliott, Gregory Grandits, Patricia Grambsch, Tracy Lucente, James D Neaton, Richard H Grimm, Lennart Hansson, Yves Lacourcière, James E Muller, Peter Sleight, Michael A Weber, William B White, Gordon H Williams, Janet Wittes, Alberto Zanchetti, Robert J Anders.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine regional differences in the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) trial.
DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, international clinical trial.
SETTING: Six hundred and sixty-one clinical centers in 15 countries. PATIENTS: Hypertensive volunteers (n = 16,602) with > or =1 additional cardiovascular risk factor, grouped into four regions: USA (n = 8144), Canada (n = 3405), Western Europe (Spain, UK, Italy, Sweden, Germany; n = 2048) or 'other' (Bulgaria, Israel, Mexico, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, Brazil; n = 2879); subgroupings included country and state/province within the USA and Canada.
INTERVENTIONS: Randomized to COER-verapamil or the investigator's choice of either atenolol or hydrochlorothiazide, titrated and additional drugs added as required. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline characteristics; blood pressure control, medication adherence and lost-to-follow-up at 2 years; and composite primary endpoint (stroke, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death) by regional groupings.
RESULTS: Regional differences were found at baseline for age, gender, blood pressure, percentage receiving antihypertensive drug therapy, initial choice of atenolol or hydrochlorothiazide, and risk factor profile. Blood pressure control rates increased markedly during follow-up in all regions, but varied significantly by region. Blood pressure control, medication adherence and lost-to-follow-up rates were poorest in the USA. After adjustment for baseline differences, the primary-event rate for each region was significantly lower than for the USA. Although baseline factors, blood pressure control and event rates varied by region, treatment differences did not.
CONCLUSION: Despite differences in baseline and follow-up measures across geographical regions, the absence of treatment differences by region suggests that the overall findings of CONVINCE are robust.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15834298     DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000166853.26087.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  3 in total

Review 1.  Impact of hypertension on stroke.

Authors:  Jordan Dubow; Matthew E Fink
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 2.  Resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Sheldon W Tobe; Richard Lewanczuk
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Evening versus morning dosing regimen drug therapy for hypertension.

Authors:  Ping Zhao; Ping Xu; Chaomin Wan; Zhengrong Wang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-10-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.