Literature DB >> 15833779

Effect of three different anaesthetic agents on the postoperative production of cardiac troponin T in paediatric cardiac surgery.

I Malagon1, K Hogenbirk, J van Pelt, M G Hazekamp, J G Bovill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Paediatric cardiac surgery is associated with some degree of myocardial injury. Ischaemic preconditioning (IP) has been investigated widely in the adult population. Volatile agents have been shown to simulate IP providing extra protection to the myocardium during adult cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) while propofol seems to act through different mechanisms. IP has not been investigated in the paediatric population to the same extent. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is a reliable marker of myocardial injury in neonates and children. We have investigated the relationship between three anaesthetic agents, midazolam, propofol, and sevoflurane, and postoperative production of cTnT.
METHODS: Ninety patients undergoing repair of congenital heart defect with CPB were investigated in a prospective randomized study. cTnT was measured four times during the first 24 h following admission to the paediatric intensive care unit. Other variables measured included arterial blood gases, lactate, fluid balance, use of inotropic drugs, PaO2/FiO2 ratio and ventilator hours.
RESULTS: cTnT was elevated in all three groups throughout the study period. The differences between the three groups were not statistically significant. Eight hours after admission to the intensive care unit cTnT concentrations tended to be higher in the midazolam group [mean (95% confidence intervals)]; 2.7 (1.9-3.5) ng ml(-1). Patients receiving a propofol-based anaesthesia had similar concentrations 2.6 (1.7-3.5) ng ml(-1) while those receiving sevoflurane tended to have a lower cTnT production 1.7 (1.3-2.2) ng ml(-1).
CONCLUSIONS: Midazolam, propofol, and sevoflurane appear to provide equal myocardial protection in paediatric cardiac surgery when using cTnT as a marker of myocardial damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15833779     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aei142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  9 in total

1.  Choice of desflurane or propofol for the maintenance of general anesthesia does not affect the risk of periprocedural myocardial damage in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Kenta Okitsu; Takeshi Iritakenishi; Tatsuyuki Imada; Michioki Kuri; Sho Carl Shibata; Yuji Fujino
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  The effect of sevoflurane versus propofol anesthesia on troponin I after congenital heart surgery, a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Leila Mahdavi; Mohammad Hasan Abdollahi; Ahmad Entezari; Ehsan Salehi; Habibollah Hosseini; Syed Hossein Moshtaghioon; Azam Rafie; Ali Akbar Rahimianfar
Journal:  Adv Biomed Res       Date:  2015-05-11

3.  A comparative study of cardioprotective effect of three anesthetic agents by measuring serum level of troponin-T after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Vali Imantalab; Abbas Seddighi Nejad; Ali Mir Mansouri; Alimohammad Sadeghi Meibodi; Mohammad Haghighi; Heidar Dadkhah; Mohammadreza Mobayen
Journal:  Int Cardiovasc Res J       Date:  2012-09-15

4.  Comparison of the myocardial protective effect of sevoflurane versus propofol in patients undergoing heart valve replacement surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Xiao-Lin Yang; Dan Wang; Guo-Yuan Zhang; Xiao-Lan Guo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.217

5.  Sevoflurane Preconditioning plus Postconditioning Decreases Inflammatory Response with Hemodynamic Recovery in Experimental Liver Ischemia Reperfusion.

Authors:  Estela Regina Ramos Figueira; Joel Avancini Rocha-Filho; Cinthia Lanchotte; Ana Maria Mendonça Coelho; Mauro Nakatani; Eduardo Ryoiti Tatebe; Jonathan Augusto Venceslau Lima; Camilla Oliveira Mendes; Bruno Camargo Rocha Paim de Araujo; Emilio Elias Abdo; Luiz Carneiro D'Albuquerque; Flavio Henrique Ferreira Galvão
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-04-07       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 6.  The role of systematic reviews in pharmacovigilance planning and Clinical Trials Authorisation application: example from the SLEEPS trial.

Authors:  Carrol Gamble; Andrew Wolf; Ian Sinha; Catherine Spowart; Paula Williamson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in neonates and children: effect of disease-a review.

Authors:  Gian Maria Pacifici
Journal:  Int J Pediatr       Date:  2014-02-18

8.  Effects of Sevoflurane and Propofol on Organ Blood Flow in Left Ventricular Assist Devices in Pigs.

Authors:  Paloma Morillas-Sendín; Emilio Delgado-Baeza; María Jesús Delgado-Martos; Mónica Barranco; Juan Francisco del Cañizo; Manuel Ruíz; Begoña Quintana-Villamandos
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Fails to Benefit Pediatric Patients Undergoing Congenital Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Hong-Tao Tie; Ming-Zhu Luo; Zhen-Han Li; Qian Wang; Qing-Chen Wu; Qiang Li; Min Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.