Literature DB >> 15833307

The relationship between object files and conscious perception.

Stephen R Mitroff1, Brian J Scholl, Karen Wynn.   

Abstract

Object files (OFs) are hypothesized mid-level representations which mediate our conscious perception of persisting objects-e.g. telling us 'which went where'. Despite the appeal of the OF framework, not previous research has directly explored whether OFs do indeed correspond to conscious percepts. Here we present at least one case wherein conscious percepts of 'which went where' in dynamic ambiguous displays diverge from the analogous correspondence computed by the OF system. Observers viewed a 'bouncing/streaming' display in which two identical objects moved such that they could have either bounced off or streamed past each other. We measured two dependent variables: (1) an explicit report of perceived bouncing or streaming; and (2) an implicit 'object-specific preview benefit' (OSPB), wherein a 'preview' of information on a specific object speeds the recognition of that information at a later point when it appears again on the same object (compared to when it reappears on a different object), beyond display-wide priming. When the displays were manipulated such that observers had a strong bias to perceive streaming (on over 95% of the trials), there was nevertheless a strong OSPB in the opposite direction-such that the object files appeared to have 'bounced' even though the percept 'streamed'. Given that OSPBs have been taken as a hallmark of the operation of object files, the five experiments reported here suggest that in at least some specialized (and perhaps ecologically invalid) cases, conscious percepts of 'which went where' in dynamic ambiguous displays can diverge from the mapping computed by the object-file system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15833307     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  16 in total

1.  Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence.

Authors:  Stephen R Mitroff; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-12

Review 2.  On the evolution of conscious attention.

Authors:  Harry Haroutioun Haladjian; Carlos Montemayor
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

3.  Binding object features to locations: Does the "spatial congruency bias" update with object movement?

Authors:  Avni N Bapat; Anna Shafer-Skelton; Colin N Kupitz; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 4.  Visual cognition.

Authors:  Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Ian P Rasmussen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Staying in bounds: Contextual constraints on object-file coherence.

Authors:  Stephen R Mitroff; Jason T Arita; Mathias S Fleck
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2009

7.  The development of individuation in autism.

Authors:  Kirsten O'Hearn; Steven Franconeri; Catherine Wright; Nancy Minshew; Beatriz Luna
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The Role of Surface Feature Continuity in Object-based Inhibition of Return.

Authors:  A Caglar Tas; Michael D Dodd; Andrew Hollingworth
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2011-11-21

9.  Object correspondence across brief occlusion is established on the basis of both spatiotemporal and surface feature cues.

Authors:  Andrew Hollingworth; Steven L Franconeri
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-09-02

10.  Perceived object trajectories during occlusion constrain visual statistical learning.

Authors:  József Fiser; Brian J Scholl; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.