| Literature DB >> 15833141 |
Frank Bühling1, Aline Wille, Christoph Röcken, Olaf Wiesner, Anja Baier, Ingmar Meinecke, Tobias Welte, Thomas Pap.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: An altered susceptibility of lung fibroblasts to Fas-induced apoptosis has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pulmonary fibrosis; however, the underlying mechanism is not completely understood. Here, we studied the susceptibility of lung fibroblasts, obtained from patients with (f-fibs) and without pulmonary fibrosis (n-fibs), to FasL- (CD95L/APO-1) induced apoptosis in relation to the expression and the amounts of membrane-bound and soluble Fas. We also analysed the effects of tumor necrosis factor-beta on FasL-induced cell death.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15833141 PMCID: PMC1087885 DOI: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-37
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Respir Res ISSN: 1465-9921
Figure 1Lung fibroblasts from patients with fibrotic lung diseases are resistant to apoptosis. Characterization of isolated fibroblasts using flow cytometry with lineage-specific monoclonal antibodies. Immunoreactivity was detected after staining with the fibroblasts specific anti-Thy-1, D7-fib and anti-P-4-H antibodies, but not with anti-CD45 and anti-CD68 antibodies. The specificity of the immunostaining (solid line) was tested using irrelevant isotype controls (dotted line). All fibroblasts samples were analyzed and representative figures were presented. Matrix deposition by isolated fibroblasts as determined by a [3H]proline incorporation. Fibroblasts derived from patients with lung fibrosis deposited more extracellular matrix (solid circles) and collagen (open circles) than non-fibrotic fibroblasts (solid and open squares). Increased apoptosis in lung fibroblasts (upper panel) compared to synovial fibroblasts (lower panel). Apoptosis was induced by incubation with Fas ligand (rhFasL) and measured after TUNEL staining. Lung fibroblasts showed significantly more apoptosis resistance. Increased resistance to pro-apoptotic signals in fibrotic fibroblasts (square) compared to control fibroblasts (circle). Apoptosis was induced by rhFasL after pre-incubation with TNF-alpha. Apoptosis was measured by quantification of histone-bound DNA fragments.
Figure 2Resistance to pro-apoptotic signals in fibrotic fibroblasts after incubation with cycloheximide and Fas ligand. Representative histograms of non-fibrotic (upper panel) and fibrotic fibroblasts (lower panel). The cells were incubated with medium, FasL, cycloheximide or FasL+cycloheximide. Only the incubation with FasL and cycloheximide resulted in significant amounts of apoptotic cells. Fibrotic fibroblasts (circles) showed increased resistance to the induction of apoptosis by FasL and cycloheximide in comparison to non-fibrotic fibroblasts (squares). Apoptotic cells were detected by flow cytometry after TUNEL staining. The cumulative data of all samples are represented as mean ± SEM, **p < 0.01.
Figure 3Expression of soluble and surface-bound Fas in normal and fibrotic lung fibroblasts. Increased levels of Fas-mRNA were found in fibrotic fibroblasts (circles) in comparison to non-fibrotic fibroblasts (squares). Fas-mRNA levels were measured using quantitative RT-PCR. Fas surface expression on isolated fibroblasts. Representative histograms of Fas-immunostaining on isolated fibroblasts (solid line). The specificity of the immunostaining was shown using irrelevant isotype-matched control antibodies (dotted line). Non-fibrotic fibroblasts (upper panel) expressed more surface bound Fas than fibrotic fibroblasts (lower panel). Cumulative data of all analysed samples showed that the percentages of Fas-positive cells (left panel) as well as the mean fluorescence intensities (right panel) were lower in fibrotic fibroblasts (circles) compared to non-fibrotic fibroblasts (squares). The results are represented as mean ± SEM. Increased concentration of soluble Fas in the supernatant of fibrotic fibroblasts (circles) in comparison to non-fibrotic fibroblasts (squares). The concentration of soluble Fas was measured by ELISA. The results are represented as mean ± SEM, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.