Literature DB >> 1583112

Performance of Haemophilus Test Media prepared with 12 different lots of Mueller-Hinton agar from four manufacturers.

A L Barry1, R R Packer.   

Abstract

Haemophilus Test Media (HTM) were prepared from 12 different lots of Mueller-Hinton agar. When tested with Haemophilus influenzae ATCC 49247, most lots were initially rejected because of small zones of inhibition for cefaclor, cefuroxime, and cefamandole disks, whereas five other drugs performed satisfactorily on the 11 lots that supported growth of the control strain. At the same time, tests of Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923 documented the acceptability of these agar media, with or without HTM supplements. The current control limits for cefaclor, cefuroxime, and cefamandole appear to be unrealistic. Because the beta-lactamase-negative, ampicillin-resistant control strain of H. influenzae (ATCC 49247) has altered penicillin-binding proteins, it is resistant to ampicillin and is probably also resistant to cefaclor, cefuroxime, and cefamandole. Consequently, media that produce no or very small zones of inhibition with those three drugs might be clinically correct and should not be rejected. One manufacturer provided three lots of Mueller-Hinton agar that gave unusually large zones of inhibition with all beta-lactams. The three other manufacturers provided eight Mueller-Hinton agars that were satisfactory for the preparation of HTM agar, provided that small zones of inhibition with cefaclor, cefuroxime, and cefamandole disks are accepted as the preferred result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1583112      PMCID: PMC265239          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.30.5.1145-1147.1992

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  7 in total

1.  Reproducibility of disc susceptibility tests with Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  A L Barry; J H Jorgensen; D J Hardy
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Failure to detect ampicillin-resistant, non-beta-lactamase-producing Haemophilus influenzae by standard disk susceptibility testing.

Authors:  P M Mendelman; D O Chaffin; C Clausen; T L Stull; C Needham; J D Williams; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Problems with current recommendations for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  P M Mendelman; E A Wiley; T L Stull; C Clausen; D O Chaffin; O Onay
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Antimicrobial resistance among respiratory isolates of Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; G V Doern; L A Maher; A W Howell; J S Redding
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Improved medium for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; J S Redding; L A Maher; A W Howell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Characterization of non-beta-lactamase-mediated ampicillin resistance in Haemophilus influenzae.

Authors:  P M Mendelman; D O Chaffin; T L Stull; C E Rubens; K D Mack; A L Smith
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Disk diffusion susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae using haemophilus test medium.

Authors:  G V Doern; J H Jorgensen; C Thornsberry; H Snapper
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.267

  7 in total
  6 in total

1.  Identification of beta-lactamase-negative, ampicillin-resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae with four methods and eight media.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs; S D Brown
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  In vitro susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae: review of new National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards recommendations.

Authors:  G V Doern
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Comparison of in-house and commercially prepared haemophilus test media for disk diffusion testing of ampicillin against Haemophilus species.

Authors:  R R Laue; P C Kohner; F R Cockerill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Tentative criteria for confirming the in vitro susceptibilities of Haemophilus influenzae and Neisseria gonorrhoeae to two fluoroquinolones (sparfloxacin and levofloxacin), including quality control parameters.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs; S D Allen; J H Jorgensen; F C Tenover; P R Murray; D J Hardy; C N Baker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Susceptibilities of beta-lactamase-producing and -nonproducing ampicillin-resistant strains of Haemophilus influenzae to ceftibuten, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefixime, cefotaxime, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs; M A Pfaller
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Development of revised quality control limits for disk diffusion susceptibility tests of selected cephem antibiotics with Haemophilus influenzae and description of a new control strain.

Authors:  J H Jorgensen; A L Barry; G V Doern; M J Ferraro; P R Murray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.