Literature DB >> 15830662

Prevalence and diversity of Campylobacter jejuni in pig herds on farms with and without cattle or poultry.

J Boes1, L Nersting, E M Nielsen, S Kranker, C Enøe, H C Wachmann, D L Baggesen.   

Abstract

The prevalence and diversity of Campylobacter jejuni was investigated in pig herds on farms with and without cattle or poultry production. A bacteriological screening of pig cecal samples from 247 finisher herds was carried out at the slaughter-house. Subsequently, a follow-up study was conducted in 24 herds (either with or without prior C. jejuni isolation from pigs) in which fecal samples were collected from pigs and, if present, cattle and poultry. Samples were analyzed for presence of Campylobacter, and subsequent analysis included species identification, serotyping, and, for selected strains, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing. In the slaughterhouse screening, C. jejuni was isolated from pigs in 21 (8.5%) herds, but no significant difference in prevalence was found between herd types (pigs, pigs and cattle, pigs and poultry). At the slaughterhouse, C. jejuni and Campylobacter coli prevalence in pigs was 2.3 and 90.1%, respectively. In the follow-up study, herd prevalence of C. jejuni was 8.3%, whereas C. jejuni and C. coli were isolated from 0.8 and 92.0% of pigs, respectively. In mixed production herds, C. jejuni predominated in cattle (42.7%) and poultry (31.6%), whereas C. jejuni was only isolated from 1.3 to 2.5% of pigs in these herds. There were no significant differences in C. jejuni or C. coli prevalence in pigs, cattle, and poultry between herds with and without prior C. jejuni isolation at the slaughterhouse. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing did not yield evidence of C. jejuni transmission between cattle or poultry and pigs in mixed production herds. In contrast, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis showed indistinguishable serotypes of C. coli in pigs and cattle in two herds. Verification of C. jejuni-positive pig samples showed that individual pigs can excrete high levels of C. jejuni and that mixed infection with C. jejuni and C. coli was common in C. jejuni-positive pigs. The results of our study suggest that transmission of C. jejuni between pigs and cattle or poultry in mixed production herds occurs infrequently. Detection of indistinguishable C. coli isolates in two herds, however, might indicate the existence of low-level transmission between pigs and cattle in herds of mixed production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15830662     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-68.4.722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  19 in total

1.  Packaging of Campylobacter jejuni into Multilamellar Bodies by the Ciliate Tetrahymena pyriformis.

Authors:  Hana Trigui; Valérie E Paquet; Steve J Charette; Sébastien P Faucher
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Assessment of biosecurity level in small-scale broiler farms in the Western highlands of Cameroon (Central Africa).

Authors:  Marc K Kouam; Manjeli Jacouba; Inouss N Nsangou; Alexis Teguia
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 1.559

3.  Cloning, expression, refolding, purification and preliminary crystallographic analysis of the sensory domain of the Campylobacter chemoreceptor for aspartate A (CcaA).

Authors:  Mayra A Machuca; Yu C Liu; Anna Roujeinikova
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.056

4.  Campylobacter excreted into the environment by animal sources: prevalence, concentration shed, and host association.

Authors:  Iain D Ogden; John F Dallas; Marion MacRae; Ovidiu Rotariu; Kenny W Reay; Malcolm Leitch; Ann P Thomson; Samuel K Sheppard; Martin Maiden; Ken J Forbes; Norval J C Strachan
Journal:  Foodborne Pathog Dis       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.171

5.  Hyperendemic Campylobacter jejuni in guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus) raised for food in a semi-rural community of Quito, Ecuador.

Authors:  Jay P Graham; Karla Vasco; Gabriel Trueba
Journal:  Environ Microbiol Rep       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.541

6.  Rapid identification and quantification of Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni by real-time PCR in pure cultures and in complex samples.

Authors:  Mily Leblanc-Maridor; François Beaudeau; Henri Seegers; Martine Denis; Catherine Belloc
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-22       Impact factor: 3.605

7.  Fate and Survival of Campylobacter coli in Swine Manure at Various Temperatures.

Authors:  Xuan Thanh Bui; Anders Wolff; Mogen Madsen; Dang Duong Bang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-26       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  Sariqa Wagley; Jane Newcombe; Emma Laing; Emmanuel Yusuf; Christine M Sambles; David J Studholme; Roberto M La Ragione; Richard W Titball; Olivia L Champion
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.605

9.  Evaluation of Various Campylobacter-Specific Quantitative PCR (qPCR) Assays for Detection and Enumeration of Campylobacteraceae in Irrigation Water and Wastewater via a Miniaturized Most-Probable-Number-qPCR Assay.

Authors:  Graham S Banting; Shannon Braithwaite; Candis Scott; Jinyong Kim; Byeonghwa Jeon; Nicholas Ashbolt; Norma Ruecker; Lisa Tymensen; Jollin Charest; Katarina Pintar; Sylvia Checkley; Norman F Neumann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The Minor Flagellin of Campylobacter jejuni (FlaB) Confers Defensive Properties against Bacteriophage Infection.

Authors:  Lukas Lis; Ian F Connerton
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.