Literature DB >> 15830348

Disease biology rather than age is the most important determinant of survival of patients > or = 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia treated with uniform intensive therapy.

Vikas Gupta1, Kathy Chun, Qi-Long Yi, Mark Minden, Andre Schuh, Richard Wells, Joseph Brandwein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives of the current study were to evaluate the outcome of patients > or = 60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated uniformly with high-dose daunorubicin containing induction and modified high-dose cytosine arabinoside containing postremission therapy, and to identify factors predictive of complete disease remission (CR) and survival.
METHODS: Between 1998 and 2002, the authors treated 117 newly diagnosed patients (acute promyelocytic leukemia excluded) with AML > or = 60 years (median, 67 years; range, 60-82 years). Karyotype (Medical Research Council classification) at diagnosis was categorized as good risk (n = 3), intermediate risk (n = 69), adverse risk (n = 26), and suboptimal/not done (n = 19). A normal karyotype was seen in 41 patients and 40 (34%) had secondary AML.
RESULTS: The outcome of induction included the following: CR, 62 (53%); early death, 5 (4%); death during hypoplasia, 14 (12%); and resistant disease, 36 (31%). The 3-year event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 9% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 3-16%) and 17% (95% CI, 9-29%), respectively. In a univariate analysis, cytogenetics, lactate dehydrogenase level, leukocyte count, and performance status were the significant factors for EFS and OS. Age was not a significant prognostic factor for either CR or survival. In a multivariate model, adverse-risk cytogenetics, previous history of myelodysplastic syndrome or antecedent hematologic disorder, and high leukocyte count (> 30 x 10(9)/L) were independent adverse prognostic factors for survival. The impact of adverse karyotype on EFS and OS was time dependent and was observed after 50 and 150 days, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded that candidacy for intensive therapy in older patients should be based on biologic features of disease and fitness, rather than on age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15830348     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.21006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  15 in total

Review 1.  Targeting polo-like kinase 1 in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Joseph M Brandwein
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2015-04

2.  Anti-leukemia effect of ex vivo expanded DNT cells from AML patients: a potential novel autologous T-cell adoptive immunotherapy.

Authors:  S Merims; X Li; B Joe; P Dokouhaki; M Han; R W Childs; Z-Y Wang; V Gupta; M D Minden; L Zhang
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-05-13       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 3.  Leukemia: stem cells, maturation arrest, and differentiation therapy.

Authors:  Stewart Sell
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.739

4.  Impairment in functional status and survival in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia.

Authors:  Ulrich Wedding; Bernd Röhrig; Almuth Klippstein; Hans-Joerg Fricke; Herbert G Sayer; Klaus Höffken
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  ELN 2017 classification significantly impacts the risk of early death in acute myeloid leukemia patients receiving intensive induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Naama Keren-Froim; Gabriel Heering; Gal Sharvit; Maya Zlotnik; Arnon Nagler; Avichai Shimoni; Abraham Avigdor; Jonathan Canaani
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.673

6.  Challenges in treating older patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Lagadinou D Eleni; Zoumbos C Nicholas; Spyridonidis Alexandros
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.375

7.  Role of induction and consolidation chemotherapy in elderly acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Authors:  Soo-Jeong Kim; June-Won Cheong; Dae-Young Kim; Je-Hwan Lee; Kyoo-Hyung Lee; Yeo-Kyeoung Kim; Hyeong-Joon Kim; Ik-Chan Song; Deog-Yeon Jo; Jeong-Ok Lee; Soo-Mee Bang; Jinny Park; Jae Hoon Lee; Won-Sik Lee; Young-Don Joo; Chi Hoon Maeng; Hwi-Joong Yoon; Na-Ri Lee; Jae-Yong Kwak; Kyoung Ha Kim; Jong-Ho Won; Bo Ram Han; Dae Young Zang; Joon Ho Moon; Sang Kyun Sohn; Sung Hwa Bae; Hun Mo Ryoo; Sung-Yong Kim; Mark Hong Lee; Yoo Hong Min
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-07-05       Impact factor: 2.490

8.  Treatment of older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): a Canadian consensus.

Authors:  Joseph M Brandwein; Michelle Geddes; Jeannine Kassis; Andrea K Kew; Brian Leber; Thomas Nevill; Mitchell Sabloff; Irwindeep Sandhu; Andre C Schuh; John M Storring; John Ashkenas
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2013-05-05

9.  American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for treating newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in older adults.

Authors:  Mikkael A Sekeres; Gordon Guyatt; Gregory Abel; Shabbir Alibhai; Jessica K Altman; Rena Buckstein; Hannah Choe; Pinkal Desai; Harry Erba; Christopher S Hourigan; Thomas W LeBlanc; Mark Litzow; Janet MacEachern; Laura C Michaelis; Sudipto Mukherjee; Kristen O'Dwyer; Ashley Rosko; Richard Stone; Arnav Agarwal; L E Colunga-Lozano; Yaping Chang; QiuKui Hao; Romina Brignardello-Petersen
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2020-08-11

10.  A phase II open-label study of aprepitant as anti-emetic prophylaxis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) undergoing induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Joseph M Brandwein; Jack T Seki; Eshetu G Atenafu; Amr Rostom; Andrzej Lutynski; Anna Rydlewski; Aaron D Schimmer; Andre C Schuh; Vikas Gupta; Karen W L Yee
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.