Literature DB >> 1582977

Diagnostic criteria of multiple myeloma.

R A Kyle1.   

Abstract

Immunoelectrophoresis or immunofixation is necessary for the identification of a monoclonal protein. During 1990 at the Mayo Clinic, 787 patients were found to have a monoclonal gammopathy. IgG accounted for 61% of the cases, followed by IgM (18%), IgA (11%), Bence Jones proteinemia (6%), biclonal gammopathy (3.5%), and IgD (0.5%). Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance accounted for approximately two thirds of patients. This denotes the presence of a monoclonal protein in persons without evidence of multiple myeloma, macroglobulinemia, amyloidosis, or other related diseases. During long-term follow-up of patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, we found that one fourth developed multiple myeloma or related disorders. The interval from recognition of the monoclonal gammopathy to the diagnosis of multiple myeloma ranged from 2 to 29 years (median, 10 years). Waldenström's macroglobulinemia developed in seven patients 4 to 20 years (median, 8.5 years) after recognition of the monoclonal protein. Systemic amyloidosis (AL) was found in eight patients 6 to 19 years (median, 9 years) after the diagnosis of a serum monoclonal protein. Five patients developed a malignant lymphoproliferative process 6 to 22 years (median, 10.5 years) after recognition of a monoclonal protein. Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma include the presence of at least 10% abnormal plasma cells in the bone marrow or histologic proof of a plasmacytoma, the usual clinical features of multiple myeloma, and at least one of the following abnormalities: monoclonal serum protein (usually greater than 3 g/dL), monoclonal protein in the urine, or osteolytic lesions. No single technique differentiates benign from malignant plasma cell proliferation. The most dependable means is serial measurement of the monoclonal protein in the serum and urine and periodic reevaluation of pertinent clinical and laboratory features to determine whether multiple myeloma, systemic amyloidosis, macroglobulinemia, or other lymphoplasma cell proliferative disease has developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1582977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8588            Impact factor:   3.722


  27 in total

1.  Extramedullary relapse in a case of multiple myeloma involving the thyroid cartilage: case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Nilkamal Kumar; A N Pandey; Rajesh Kashyap; Gaurav Agarwal
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-11-19

2.  Efficacy of retreatment with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in patients receiving IMiDs for initial therapy of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Sumit Madan; Martha Q Lacy; Angela Dispenzieri; Morie A Gertz; Francis Buadi; Suzanne R Hayman; Kristen Detweiler-Short; David Dingli; Steven Zeldenrust; John Lust; Philip R Greipp; S Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  Evaluation of Suspected Monoclonal Gammopathies: Experience in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Authors:  G S Chopra; P K Gupta; D K Mishra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

4.  Phenotypic and genotypic alterations characterize patients bearing plasma cell dyscrasias with a high M-component.

Authors:  C Greco; F Ameglio; F Alvino; A Mosiello; A M Cianciulli; I Venturo; G Del Monte; M Giampaolo; A W Tong; G M Gandolfo
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.831

5.  Aberrant Levels of miRNAs in Bone Marrow Microenvironment and Peripheral Blood of Myeloma Patients and Disease Progression.

Authors:  Weixin Wang; Meghan Corrigan-Cummins; Emily A Barber; Layla M Saleh; Adriana Zingone; Azam Ghafoor; Rene Costello; Yong Zhang; Roger J Kurlander; Neha Korde; Aldo M Roccaro; Irene M Ghobrial; Ola Landgren; Katherine R Calvo
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.568

6.  Non-secreting multiple myeloma switches to IgD of lamda type: a case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Lili Gao; Qinlu Li; Jinsong Kang; Chunrui Li; Jianfeng Zhou
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

7.  IgM multiple myeloma with an extremely rare non-aggressive presentation: A case report.

Authors:  Thomas Greuter; Martin Browne; Corina Dommann-Scherrer; Daniel Binder; Christoph Renner; Ursula Kapp
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Plasma cell myeloma in unusually young patients: a report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  T Ishida; H D Dorfman
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Immunophenotypic characterization of plasma cells from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients. Implications for the differential diagnosis between MGUS and multiple myeloma.

Authors:  M Ocqueteau; A Orfao; J Almeida; J Bladé; M González; R García-Sanz; C López-Berges; M J Moro; J Hernández; L Escribano; D Caballero; M Rozman; J F San Miguel
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Nervous system lymphoid infiltration in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. A case report.

Authors:  S Massengo; L Riffaud; X Morandi; M Bernard; M Verin
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.