Literature DB >> 15829627

AMPA receptor binding cleft mutations that alter affinity, efficacy, and recovery from desensitization.

Antoine Robert1, Neali Armstrong, J Eric Gouaux, James R Howe.   

Abstract

Glutamate binds to AMPA receptors within a deep cleft between two globular protein domains (domains 1 and 2). Once glutamate binds, the cleft closes, and agonist-bound structures of the isolated ligand binding core suggest that closure of the binding cleft is sufficiently complete that it essentially prevents ligand dissociation. There is also considerable evidence supporting the view that cleft closure is the initial conformational change that triggers receptor activation and desensitization, and it has been clearly demonstrated that there is a correlation between the degree of cleft closure and agonist efficacy. It is unknown, however, whether the stability of binding cleft closure also influences receptor-channel properties. The crystallographic structures indicate that closed-cleft conformations are stabilized by the formation of hydrogen bonds that involve amino acid side chains of residues in domains 1 and 2. We show here that mutations that disrupt one such cross-cleft hydrogen bond (in the AMPA receptor subunit GluR2) decrease both agonist affinity and efficacy. The same mutations also hasten recovery from desensitization. We conclude that the stability of binding cleft closure has a significant impact on AMPA receptor function and is a major determinant of the apparent affinity of agonists. The results suggest that the stability of cleft closure has been tuned so that glutamate dissociates as rapidly as possible yet remains a full agonist.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15829627      PMCID: PMC6724928          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0188-05.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  62 in total

1.  GluN1-specific redox effects on the kinetic mechanism of NMDA receptor activation.

Authors:  Iehab Talukder; Rashek Kazi; Lonnie P Wollmuth
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Glutamate receptor ion channels: structure, regulation, and function.

Authors:  Stephen F Traynelis; Lonnie P Wollmuth; Chris J McBain; Frank S Menniti; Katie M Vance; Kevin K Ogden; Kasper B Hansen; Hongjie Yuan; Scott J Myers; Ray Dingledine
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 25.468

3.  On the mechanisms of alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) receptor binding to glutamate and kainate.

Authors:  Michael K Fenwick; Robert E Oswald
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 4.  Emerging models of glutamate receptor ion channel structure and function.

Authors:  Mark L Mayer
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  The relationship between agonist potency and AMPA receptor kinetics.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Antoine Robert; Stine B Vogensen; James R Howe
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  The free energy landscapes governing conformational changes in a glutamate receptor ligand-binding domain.

Authors:  Albert Y Lau; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  TARP subtypes differentially and dose-dependently control synaptic AMPA receptor gating.

Authors:  Aaron D Milstein; Wei Zhou; Siavash Karimzadegan; David S Bredt; Roger A Nicoll
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Molecular mechanism of ligand recognition by NR3 subtype glutamate receptors.

Authors:  Yongneng Yao; Chris B Harrison; Peter L Freddolino; Klaus Schulten; Mark L Mayer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Stability of ligand-binding domain dimer assembly controls kainate receptor desensitization.

Authors:  Charu Chaudhry; Matthew C Weston; Peter Schuck; Christian Rosenmund; Mark L Mayer
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Crosslinking the ligand-binding domain dimer interface locks kainate receptors out of the main open state.

Authors:  Bryan A Daniels; Elizabeth D Andrews; Mark R P Aurousseau; Michael V Accardi; Derek Bowie
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.