Literature DB >> 15829324

Poor correspondence between clinical and pathologic staging in stage 1 non-small cell lung cancer: results from CALGB 9761, a prospective trial.

Jonathan D'Cunha1, James E Herndon, Debra L Herzan, G Alexander Patterson, Leslie J Kohman, David H Harpole, Kemp H Kernstine, Jeffrey A Kern, Mark R Green, Michael A Maddaus, Robert A Kratzke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: A major problem with the staging system for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is clinical underestimation of the extent of disease. Many patients with clinical stage 1 disease do not retain that designation following surgical resection. Herein, we present data from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) protocol 9761 evaluating the correspondence between clinical and pathologic analysis in early stage NSCLC.
METHODS: Five hundred and two patients with suspected or biopsy-proven NSCLC classified as clinical stage 1 (T1-2, N0) by computed tomography (CT) scan or cervical mediastinoscopy were prospectively enrolled in CALGB 9761. The purpose of CALGB 9761 was to prospectively evaluate molecular markers of micrometastatic disease in stage 1 NSCLC. Enrollment occurred at 11 selected institutions within the CALGB. Patients with clinically suspected resectable early stage lung cancer were eligible for enrollment if they had no evidence of mediastinal or hilar adenopathy on CT scan or if they had CT evidence of potential N2 or N3 disease (lymph node > or =1.0 cm) but with negative mediastinoscopy. No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy was permitted.
RESULTS: Of the 502 patients felt to have clinical stage 1 NSCLC enrolled in CALGB 9761, 489 underwent resection with complete surgical staging and routine histopathologic analysis. From these 489 patients, only 422 (86.3%) turned out to have pathologically documented NSCLC. Of these 422 patients, 302 (71.6%) had pathologic stage 1 disease (173 stage 1A and 129 stage 1B). Despite clinical assessment of stage 1 disease, 59 (14%) patients had pathologic stage 2 disease, 57 (13.5%) had stage 3 disease, and four (0.9%) patients had stage 4 disease. Of the patients undergoing resection for clinical stage 1 NSCLC, 65 patients did not have NSCLC (44 had benign disease and 21 had malignancies other than NSCLC) and two additional patients had dual synchronous primary NSCLC tumors and were not eligible for the study. Overall, only 61.7% (302 of 489) of patients with suspected stage 1 NSCLC disease retained that stage and diagnosis after complete surgical staging, while 38.3% had an inaccurate pre-operative clinical stage or diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: The results from this prospective trial demonstrate the poor predictive value of current clinical staging techniques in early stage NSCLC. These findings will serve as a benchmark for comparison of future clinical imaging modalities and other tests evaluating early stage NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15829324     DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2004.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung Cancer        ISSN: 0169-5002            Impact factor:   5.705


  30 in total

1.  Additional data in the debate on stage I non-small cell lung cancer: surgery versus stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.

Authors:  Charles B Simone; Jay F Dorsey
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2015-08

2.  Pathologic Upstaging in Patients Undergoing Resection for Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Are There Modifiable Predictors?

Authors:  Matthew J Bott; Aalok P Patel; Traves D Crabtree; Graham A Colditz; Daniel Kreisel; A Sasha Krupnick; G Alexander Patterson; Stephen Broderick; Bryan F Meyers; Varun Puri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 3.  Towards optimal pathologic staging of resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Gail E Darling
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10

4.  Pathological upstaging and treatment strategy of clinical stage I small cell lung cancer following surgery.

Authors:  Hisashi Saji; Tomoyuki Miyazawa; Hideki Marushima; Haruhiko Nakamura
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Detection of Occult Micrometastases in Patients With Clinical Stage I Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Analysis of Mature Results of CALGB 9761 (Alliance).

Authors:  Linda W Martin; Jonathan D'Cunha; Xiaofei Wang; Debra Herzan; Lin Gu; Naif Abraham; Todd L Demmy; Frank C Detterbeck; Shawn S Groth; David H Harpole; Mark J Krasna; Kemp Kernstine; Leslie J Kohman; G Alexander Patterson; David J Sugarbaker; Robin T Vollmer; Michael A Maddaus; Robert A Kratzke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Extent of lymph node resection does not increase perioperative morbidity and mortality after surgery for stage I lung cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  M Shapiro; G Mhango; M Kates; T S Weiser; C Chin; S J Swanson; J P Wisnivesky
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Meet the new boss: lung cancer staging.

Authors:  Abbie Begnaud; Robert A Kratzke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Mediastinal lymph nodes: ignore? sample? dissect? The role of mediastinal node dissection in the surgical management of primary lung cancer.

Authors:  Jean Deslauriers
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-08-09

9.  Improving the pathologic evaluation of lung cancer resection specimens.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Holly L Hilsenbeck; Elizabeth W Sales; Allen Berry; Robert W Jarrett; Christopher S Giampapa; Clara N Finch-Cruz; David Spencer
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

10.  Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a word of caution.

Authors:  Gonzalo Varela; María Teresa Gómez-Hernández
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.