Literature DB >> 15829084

The intraparietal sulcus and perceptual organization.

Rhodri Cusack1.   

Abstract

The structuring of the sensory scene (perceptual organization) profoundly affects what we perceive, and is of increasing clinical interest. In both vision and audition, many cues have been identified that influence perceptual organization, but only a little is known about its neural basis. Previous studies have suggested that auditory cortex may play a role in auditory perceptual organization (also called auditory stream segregation). However, these studies were limited in that they just examined auditory cortex and that the stimuli they used to generate different organizations had different physical characteristics, which per se may have led to the differences in neural response. In the current study, functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to test for an effect of perceptual organization across the whole brain. To avoid confounding physical changes to the stimuli with differences in perceptual organization, we exploited an ambiguous auditory figure that is sometimes perceived as a single auditory stream and sometimes as two streams. We found that regions in the intraparietal sulcus (IPS ) showed greater activity when 2 streams were perceived rather than 1. The specific involvement of this region in perceptual organization is exciting, as there is a growing literature that suggests a role for the IPS in binding in vision, touch, and cross-modally. This evidence is discussed, and a general role proposed for regions of the IPS in structuring sensory input.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15829084     DOI: 10.1162/0898929053467541

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  85 in total

Review 1.  Behind the scenes of auditory perception.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Effects of self-motion on auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Hirohito M Kondo; Daniel Pressnitzer; Iwaki Toshima; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  An expanded role for the dorsal auditory pathway in sensorimotor control and integration.

Authors:  Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 4.  Neural correlates of auditory scene analysis and perception.

Authors:  Kate L Christison-Lagay; Adam M Gifford; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Neuromagnetic correlates of streaming in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Gutschalk; Christophe Micheyl; Jennifer R Melcher; André Rupp; Michael Scherg; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cortical FMRI activation to sequences of tones alternating in frequency: relationship to perceived rate and streaming.

Authors:  E Courtenay Wilson; Jennifer R Melcher; Christophe Micheyl; Alexander Gutschalk; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Preparatory allocation of attention and adjustments in conflict processing.

Authors:  Tracy L Luks; Gregory V Simpson; Corby L Dale; Morgan G Hough
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Episodic encoding is more than the sum of its parts: an fMRI investigation of multifeatural contextual encoding.

Authors:  Melina R Uncapher; Leun J Otten; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-11-09       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Neuronal phase consistency tracks dynamic changes in acoustic spectral regularity.

Authors:  Adam M Gifford; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini Sharan; Richard J Gorniak; Ryan B Williams; Kathryn Davis; Michael J Kahana; Yale E Cohen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.