Literature DB >> 15827844

Why we need confidence intervals.

Douglas G Altman1.   

Abstract

The estimation approach to statistical analysis aims to quantify the effect of interest as an "estimate" of a clinically relevant quantity and to quantify the uncertainty in this estimate by means of a confidence interval (CI). As such, results expressed in this form are much more informative than results presented just as p values. This article focuses on the principles rather than the mathematics of CIs and discusses interpretation of CIs and some common misuses. CIs can be constructed for almost all analyses. They are especially useful for avoiding misinterpretation of nonsignificant results of small studies. CIs should be provided routinely for the main results of trials and observational studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15827844     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-7911-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  11 in total

1.  The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials.

Authors:  D Moher; K F Schulz; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-04-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; J Martin Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-25

3.  No effect of drains on the postoperative hematoma volume in hip replacement surgery: a randomized study using scintigraphy.

Authors:  Jan Widman; Hans Jacobsson; Stig A Larsson; Johan Isacson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-12

4.  Confidence intervals illuminate absence of evidence.

Authors:  Doug Altman; J Martin Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-04-24

5.  Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Authors:  Phil Alderson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-02-28

6.  Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Authors:  D G Altman; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-19

7.  Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries.

Authors:  D P Taggart; R D'Amico; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial.

Authors:  Ka Lau Leung; Samuel P Y Kwok; Steve C W Lam; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Simon S M Ng; Paul B S Lai; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-04-10       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia.

Authors:  Leigh Neumayer; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Olga Jonasson; Robert Fitzgibbons; Dorothy Dunlop; James Gibbs; Domenic Reda; William Henderson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-04-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Impact of valve surgery on 6-month mortality in adults with complicated, left-sided native valve endocarditis: a propensity analysis.

Authors:  Holenarasipur R Vikram; Joan Buenconsejo; Rodrigo Hasbun; Vincent J Quagliarello
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  14 in total

1.  Users' Guide to the Surgical Literature. Understanding confidence intervals.

Authors:  Margherita Cadeddu; Forough Farrokhyar; Carolyn Levis; Sylvie Cornacchi; Ted Haines; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Comparisons of the tolerability and sensitivity of quetiapine-XR in the acute treatment of schizophrenia, bipolar mania, bipolar depression, major depressive disorder, and generalized anxiety disorder.

Authors:  Zuowei Wang; David E Kemp; Philip K Chan; Yiru Fang; Stephen J Ganocy; Joseph R Calabrese; Keming Gao
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.176

3.  The use of confidence intervals in reporting orthopaedic research findings.

Authors:  Patrick Vavken; Klemens M Heinrich; Christian Koppelhuber; Stefan Rois; Ronald Dorotka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Misinterpretation of statistical results and recurrent intracranial hemangiopericytoma.

Authors:  Da Li; Jun-Ting Zhang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-11-02       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Statistical data presentation: a primer for rheumatology researchers.

Authors:  Durga Prasanna Misra; Olena Zimba; Armen Yuri Gasparyan
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.631

6.  Using the confidence interval confidently.

Authors:  Avijit Hazra
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Design and statistical analysis of oral medicine studies: common pitfalls.

Authors:  L Baccaglini; J J Shuster; J Cheng; D W Theriaque; V J Schoenbach; S L Tomar; C Poole
Journal:  Oral Dis       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 3.511

8.  A method to compute multiplicity corrected confidence intervals for odds ratios and other relative effect estimates.

Authors:  Jimmy Thomas Efird; Susan Searles Nielsen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Diagnostic utility of zinc protoporphyrin to detect iron deficiency in Kenyan preschool children: a community-based survey.

Authors:  Emily M Teshome; Andrew M Prentice; Ayşe Y Demir; Pauline E A Andang'o; Hans Verhoef
Journal:  BMC Hematol       Date:  2017-07-27

Review 10.  Statistical Significance Versus Clinical Importance of Observed Effect Sizes: What Do P Values and Confidence Intervals Really Represent?

Authors:  Patrick Schober; Sebastiaan M Bossers; Lothar A Schwarte
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.