Literature DB >> 15827793

Hepatic resection at a major community-based teaching hospital can result in good outcome.

Ramaz E Metreveli1, Katherine Sahm, Frederick Denstman, Raafat Abdel-Misih, Nicholas J Petrelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relationship between volume and outcome has been established in the literature for several complex surgical procedures. Improved outcome has been suggested at high-volume hospitals or with high-volume surgeons.
METHODS: The objective of this study was to evaluate the experience of a low-volume hospital with major liver resections. The setting of the study was a community-based teaching hospital with a surgical residency training program.
RESULTS: A total of 46 major liver resections were performed between January 1992 and December 2002. Procedures performed were hepatic lobectomies (n = 15; right, n = 11; left, n = 4), trisegmentectomies (n = 5; right, n = 3; left, n = 2), segmentectomies (n = 16; left lateral, n = 12; right posterior, n = 4), and wedge resections (n = 10). Operations were performed by 14 different surgeons; however, 23 operations were performed by 1 surgeon. Sixteen patients (34%) developed 23 complications. The average length of hospital stay was 9.7 days. There were no 30-day postoperative mortalities. Out of 46 patients who underwent major liver resection over the last 10 years, 13 patients are still alive. Overall survival ranged from 3 to 84 months, with a median survival of 30.6 months. The actual 5-year survival was 36% (8 of 22) for all patients operated on >5 years ago, and the actual 2-year survival was 61% (20 of 33).
CONCLUSIONS: Major liver resection can be performed safely with low rates of morbidity and operative mortality with careful selection of patients at a low-volume community-based teaching hospital.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15827793     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  4 in total

1.  High volume and outcome after liver resection: surgeon or center?

Authors:  Robert W Eppsteiner; Nicholas G Csikesz; Jessica P Simons; Jennifer F Tseng; Shimul A Shah
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  The volume effect in liver surgery--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Arthur J Richardson; Tony C Y Pang; Emma Johnston; Michael J Hollands; Vincent W T Lam; Henry C C Pleass
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Two hundred and forty-one consecutive liver resections: an experience from India.

Authors:  Sanjay Marwah; Mohammed Mustafizur Rahman Khan; Adarsh Chaudhary; Subash Gupta; Sanjay Singh Negi; Arvinder Soin; Samiran Nundy
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.647

4.  Operative mortality, blood loss and the use of Pringle manoeuvres in 526 consecutive liver resections.

Authors:  Jeffrey T Lordan; Tim R Worthington; Nial Quiney; William J Fawcett; Nariman D Karanjia
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 1.891

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.