Literature DB >> 15827678

Results of hysterectomy in patients with bulky residual disease at the end of chemoradiotherapy for stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma.

Elie Azria1, Philippe Morice, Christine Haie-Meder, Anne Thoury, Patricia Pautier, Catherine Lhomme, Pierre Duvillard, Damienne Castaigne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We assessed the clinical outcome after hysterectomy in patients with bulky residual disease after chemoradiotherapy for stage IB2/II cervical carcinoma.
METHODS: Subjects were 10 patients who had bulky (>2 cm) residual disease in the cervix after external radiotherapy (45 Gy) combined with concomitant chemotherapy (cisplatin 40 mg/m2/week) and uterovaginal brachytherapy (15 Gy).
RESULTS: Extrafascial hysterectomy was performed in three patients, type II radical hysterectomy was performed in six patients, and pelvic exenteration was performed in one patient. Pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in eight patients, and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was performed in eight. Five patients had nodal involvement (pelvic nodes in four and para-aortic nodes in four), and six had lymphovascular space involvement. Surgical margins were free in nine patients. Seven patients developed grade 2 (n = 3) and/or grade 3 (n = 4) complications. The median duration of follow-up after surgery was 22 months (range, 1-37 months). With follow-up available in nine patients, seven relapsed, and only two remained disease free.
CONCLUSIONS: This series confirms the high rate of nodal spread in patients with bulky residual cervical disease after chemoradiotherapy. Furthermore, patients who underwent hysterectomy had a high complication rate. Only two patients are alive and disease free. The results of surgery are disappointing; surgery does not seem to improve the survival of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15827678     DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2005.05.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  20 in total

1.  The role of additional hysterectomy after concurrent chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Kosuke Yoshida; Hiroaki Kajiyama; Masato Yoshihara; Satoshi Tamauchi; Yoshiki Ikeda; Nobuhisa Yoshikawa; Kimihiro Nishino; Kaoru Niimi; Shiro Suzuki; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Radiation therapy versus surgery for patients with cervical squamous cell carcinoma who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy revisited.

Authors:  Yu Furuta; Yukiharu Todo; Hiroyuki Yamazaki; Chisa Shimada; Sho Takeshita; Kazuhira Okamoto; Hidenori Kato
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Prognostic factors and morbidities after completion surgery in patients undergoing initial chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Cyril Touboul; Catherine Uzan; Audrey Mauguen; Sebastien Gouy; Annie Rey; Patricia Pautier; Catherine Lhommé; Pierre Duvillard; Christine Haie-Meder; Philippe Morice
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-03-23

4.  Results of the GYNECO 02 study, an FNCLCC phase III trial comparing hysterectomy with no hysterectomy in patients with a (clinical and radiological) complete response after chemoradiation therapy for stage IB2 or II cervical cancer.

Authors:  Philippe Morice; Philippe Rouanet; Annie Rey; Pascale Romestaing; Gilles Houvenaeghel; Jean Charles Boulanger; Jean Leveque; Didier Cowen; Patrice Mathevet; Jean Pierre Malhaire; Guillaume Magnin; Eric Fondrinier; Jocelyne Berille; Christine Haie-Meder
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-01-10

Review 5.  Adenocarcinoma of the cervix: should we treat it differently?

Authors:  Ned L Williams; Theresa L Werner; Elke A Jarboe; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Hysterectomy with radiotherapy or chemotherapy or both for women with locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Fani Kokka; Andrew Bryant; Adeola Olaitan; Elly Brockbank; Melanie Powell; David Oram
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-08-22

7.  Comparison of tumor regression rate of uterine cervical squamous cell carcinoma during external beam and intracavitary radiotherapy.

Authors:  Kiyoshi Ohara; Yumiko Oishi Tanaka; Akinori Oki; Yoshikazu Okamoto; Toyomi Satoh; Koji Matsumoto; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2008-11-22

8.  Adaptive 3D image-guided brachytherapy: a strong argument in the debate on systematic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  Renaud Mazeron; Jennifer Gilmore; Isabelle Dumas; Jérôme Champoudry; Jennifer Goulart; Ben Vanneste; Anne Tailleur; Philippe Morice; Christine Haie-Meder
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-04-08

9.  Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline.

Authors:  Junzo Chino; Christina M Annunziata; Sushil Beriwal; Lisa Bradfield; Beth A Erickson; Emma C Fields; KathrynJane Fitch; Matthew M Harkenrider; Christine H Holschneider; Mitchell Kamrava; Eric Leung; Lilie L Lin; Jyoti S Mayadev; Marc Morcos; Chika Nwachukwu; Daniel Petereit; Akila N Viswanathan
Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-05-18

10.  Brachytherapy versus radical hysterectomy after external beam chemoradiation: a non-randomized matched comparison in IB2-IIB cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Lucely Cetina; Alicia Garcia-Arias; Myrna Candelaria; David Cantú; Lesbia Rivera; Jaime Coronel; Blanca Bazan-Perkins; Vladimir Flores; Aaron Gonzalez; Alfonso Dueñas-González
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-02-16       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.