Literature DB >> 15826229

Effector-dependent learning by observation of a finger movement sequence.

Geoffrey Bird1, Cecilia Heyes.   

Abstract

Can observational learning be effector dependent? In 3 experiments, observers watched a model respond to a 6-item unique sequence in a serial reaction time task. Their sequence knowledge was then compared with that of controls who had performed an unrelated task or observed a model responding to random targets. Observational learning was indicated when the introduction of a new sequence was associated with more reaction time elevation in observers than in controls. The authors found evidence of observational learning only when observers used the finger movement sequence that they observed during training, not when they responded at the same sequence of locations using different digits. Free generation and recognition tests also detected observational learning. These results imply that observational learning can be both explicit and effector dependent. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15826229     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  26 in total

1.  In the absence of physical practice, observation and imagery do not result in updating of internal models for aiming.

Authors:  Nicole T Ong; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Learning through observation: a combination of expert and novice models favors learning.

Authors:  Hassan Rohbanfard; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Grist and mills: on the cultural origins of cultural learning.

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Incidental action observation modulates muscle activity.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Jeremy Hogeveen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  General motor representations are developed during action-observation.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Digby Elliott; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Low Fidelity Imitation of Atypical Biological Kinematics in Autism Spectrum Disorders Is Modulated by Self-Generated Selective Attention.

Authors:  Spencer J Hayes; Matthew Andrew; Digby Elliott; Emma Gowen; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2016-02

7.  Observation learning of a motor task: who and when?

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-08       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.

Authors:  Shannon B Lim; Beverley C Larssen; Nicola J Hodges
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Mixed observation favors motor learning through better estimation of the model's performance.

Authors:  Mathieu Andrieux; Luc Proteau
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 10.  Enquire within: cultural evolution and cognitive science.

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.