Literature DB >> 15825890

Effects of runway shift and stay rules on rats' serial pattern learning in the T-maze.

Jerome Cohen1, Kimberly Westlake, Izabela Szelest.   

Abstract

Rats received three-trial series on a T-maze consisting of extended visually distinct left-black and right-striped side runways. During the first phase of training, when allowed to select baited runways within these series, they predominantly alternated their choices. During the second phase, rats received forced-choice serial pattern training of series consisting of two rewarded (R) trials and one nonrewarded (N) trial in two fixed orders, RRN and RNR. In Experiment 1, the rats in the runway shift rule group always received the second R trial when forced down a runway opposite that on the preceding trial in the series and the N trial when forced down the same runway. The rats in the runway stay rule group always received the second R trial when forced down the same runway and the N trial when forced down the opposite runway. In Experiment 2, each rat was conditionally trained with both runway outcome rules as determined by the central alley lighting and the type of food in the side alleys. The rats took longer to reduce their running speed on the N trial within each sequence under the runway stay rule than under the runway shift rule. They also took longer to acquire serial pattern responding for the RNR than for the RRN series only under the runway stay rule condition. When subsequently reexposed to series of free-choice trials on the final phase, rats maintained spontaneous alternating choice patterns under the runway shift rule conditions but either seldom alternated their choices (Experiment 1) or greatly reduced choice alternations (Experiment 2) under the runway stay rule condition. We discussed these effects in terms of rats' natural foraging strategies and as a factor that interacts with other within- and between-series variables that affect serial pattern behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15825890     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  3 in total

1.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

2.  Cues for spontaneous alternation.

Authors:  R J Douglas
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-10

3.  Integration and representation in rats' serial pattern learning in the T-maze.

Authors:  J S Cohen; A Simpson; K Westlake; P Hamelin
Journal:  Anim Learn Behav       Date:  2002-08
  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Effects of forced-choice runway variations on rats' T-maze serial pattern learning.

Authors:  Izabela Szelest; Jerome Cohen
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Rat strain influences the use of egocentric learning strategies mediated by neostriatum.

Authors:  Pablo Espina-Marchant; Teresa Pinto-Hamuy; Diego Bustamante; Paola Morales; Mario Herrera-Marschitz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Win-stay and win-shift lever-press strategies in an appetitively reinforced task for rats.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Retention period differentially attenuates win-shift/lose-stay relative to win-stay/lose-shift performance in the rat.

Authors:  Phil Reed
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.986

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.