Literature DB >> 15825747

The cost and yield of photoscreening: impact of photoscreening on overall pediatric ophthalmic costs.

Robert W Arnold1, M Diane Armitage, Elisha G Gionet, Adam Balinger, Tatiana A Kovtoun, Christy Machida, Lynn J Coon.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of preschool-age children suffer from amblyopia. Many of them have high or unequal hyperopia. Amblyogenic risk factors frequently can be detected by photoscreening.
METHODS: Free photoscreening was offered to Alaskan children ages 1 to 5 from urban and rural screening hubs. Screened images were mailed to the Alaska Blind Child Discovery coordinating center for physician photoscreen interpretation, specifically seeking latent or anisometropic hyperopia. Parents and screeners then were mailed results and information about amblyopia. Follow-up examination data were tallied, and a cost-consequence analysis was developed for various vision screening paradigms and eye care.
RESULTS: From 1996 through 2003, a total of 13,255 screenings were performed with a positive interpretation rate of 4.7%. Penetrance of screening was 22% in urban and 44% in rural communities. Positive predictive value was estimated to be more than 90%. Average cost to screen and inform an Alaskan preschooler was approximately 10.67 dollars, and cost to detect amblyogenic risk factors by photoscreening in an Alaskan was approximately 206 dollars. Compared to American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 1995 guidelines, implementing photoscreening added 9%, while mandating complete prekindergarten examination added 49% to overall eye care.
CONCLUSIONS: MTI photoscreening achieved high community penetrance and high positive predictive value for latent hyperopia and other amblyogenic factors. When follow-up costs are considered, adding photoscreening to current AAP guidelines may add 112 dollars per child over 10 years, but probably would assist in the reduction of amblyopia. Penetrance of urban photoscreening likely will remain low unless pediatric vision screening guidelines and reimbursement are revised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15825747     DOI: 10.3928/01913913-20050301-05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus        ISSN: 0191-3913            Impact factor:   1.402


  5 in total

1.  Vision screening in infants, children and youth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  The potential cost-effectiveness of amblyopia screening programs.

Authors:  David B Rein; John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Michael Song; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Assessment of a modification of Brückner's test as a screening modality for anisometropia and strabismus.

Authors:  Abadan Khan Amitava; D Kewlani; Z Khan; A Razzak
Journal:  Oman J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09

Review 4.  Cost and quality of life of overlooked eye care needs of children.

Authors:  Monali S Malvankar-Mehta; Ryan Wilson; Erik Leci; Kelly Hatch; Sapna Sharan
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2018-02-23

Review 5.  Scope and costs of autorefraction and photoscreening for childhood amblyopia-a systematic narrative review in relation to the EUSCREEN project data.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Helen J Griffiths; Jill Carlton; Paolo Mazzone; Arinder Channa; Mandy Nordmann; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 3.775

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.