Literature DB >> 15824658

Should patients with isolated hip fractures be included in trauma registries?

Eric Bergeron1, Andre Lavoie, Amina Belcaid, Sebastien Ratte, David Clas.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with isolated hip fractures are frequently excluded from trauma registries. The goal of this study was to show that patients with these injuries have higher resource use and poorer outcomes than the rest of the trauma population.
METHODS: The Quebec Trauma Registry was used to identify all trauma patients from April 1, 1998, to March 31, 2003. Patients who were dead on arrival at the emergency room were excluded. Isolated hip fracture (HIP) was defined as a diagnosis of a single fracture to the neck of the femur (Abbreviated Injury Scale 1990 codes 851808.3, 851810.3, 851812.3, and 851818.3) secondary to a fall and for which the Injury Severity Score was 9 or 10 (no other Abbreviated Injury Scale code higher than 1). Patients with all other trauma diagnosis (OT) were used for comparison. Outcome variables were length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, in-hospital complications, and status and orientation at discharge. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used.
RESULTS: There were 68,422 patients: 14,426 (21.1%) HIP patients and 53,996 (78.9%) OT patients. The median Injury Severity Score was 9 for HIP (range, 9-10) and 9 for OT (range, 1-75). Mean length of hospital stay was 18.4 days for HIP compared with 11.7 days for OT (p < 0.0001). HIP patients represented 29.5% of the total hospital stay. ICU stay was required for 1,353 HIP patients (9.4%) and for 12,395 (23.0%) OT patients (p < 0.0001). Mean ICU stay was 3.9 days for HIP compared with 5.5 days for OT (p = 0.0006). In-hospital mortality was 8.5% in HIP compared with 3.7% in OT (p < 0.0001). HIP represented 62.7% of patients referred for long-term care and 39.3% of patients referred to a rehabilitation center.
CONCLUSION: Patients with HIP represented 21.1% of admissions while accounting for 42% of total days of hospitalization and 38% of deaths. Patients with hip fractures have a significantly higher risk of death, prolonged hospital stay, and complication rate, and are more often transferred to a rehabilitation center or to a long-term nursing home than the rest of the trauma population despite lower severity. They require multidisciplinary care typical of the rest of the trauma population and should be included in the trauma registry if the registry is to document the full outcome and resource use of the trauma population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15824658     DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000158245.23772.0a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  7 in total

1.  Comparisons of the Outcome Prediction Performance of Injury Severity Scoring Tools Using the Abbreviated Injury Scale 90 Update 98 (AIS 98) and 2005 Update 2008 (AIS 2008).

Authors:  Hideo Tohira; Ian Jacobs; David Mountain; Nick Gibson; Allen Yeo
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2011

2.  Evaluation of the influence of the definition of an isolated hip fracture as an exclusion criterion for trauma system benchmarking: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  J Tiao; L Moore; T V Porgo; A Belcaid
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.693

3.  The evolution of trauma services at Beaumont Hospital.

Authors:  M C Fitzgibbon; M Donnelly; J P Phillips; P Murray; R Moran; D J Bouchier-Hayes
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.568

4.  Establishing consensus on the definition of an isolated hip fracture for trauma system performance evaluation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Judith Tiao; Lynne Moore; Amélie Boutin; Alexis F Turgeon
Journal:  J Emerg Trauma Shock       Date:  2014-07

5.  Improvement of the performance of survival prediction in the ageing blunt trauma population: A cohort study.

Authors:  Leonie de Munter; Nancy C W Ter Bogt; Suzanne Polinder; Charlie A Sewalt; Ewout W Steyerberg; Mariska A C de Jongh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Accuracy of the Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the enUmeration of Mortality and morbidity score and the Nottingham risk score in hip fracture patients in Sweden - A prospective observational study.

Authors:  M H Jonsson; P Bentzer; A Turkiewicz; A Hommel
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 2.105

7.  Clinical Indications of Computed Tomography (CT) of the Head in Patients With Low-Energy Geriatric Hip Fractures: A Follow-Up Study at a Community Hospital.

Authors:  Kris Danielson; Teresa Hall; Terrence Endres; Clifford Jones; Deb Sietsema
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.