Literature DB >> 15824182

Effects of electron-beam irradiation on whole genome amplification.

Andrew W Bergen1, Ying Qi, Kashif A Haque, Robert A Welch, Montserrat Garcia-Closas, Stephen J Chanock, Jim Vaught, Philip E Castle.   

Abstract

Electron-beam (E-beam) irradiation, currently being used to sterilize mail addressed to selected ZIP codes in the United States, has significant negative effects on the genomic integrity of DNA extracted from buccal-cell washes. We investigated the yield, composition, and genotyping performance of whole genome amplified DNA (wgaDNA) derived from 24 matched samples of E-beam-irradiated and nonirradiated genomic DNA (gDNA) as a model for the effects of degraded gDNA on the performance of whole genome amplification. gDNA was amplified using the Multiple Displacement Amplification method. Three methods of DNA quantification analysis were used to estimate the yield and composition of wgaDNA, and 65 short tandem repeat and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping assays were used to evaluate the genotyping performance of irradiated and nonirradiated gDNA and wgaDNA. Compared with wgaDNA derived from nonirradiated gDNA, wgaDNA derived from irradiated gDNA exhibited a significantly reduced yield of wgaDNA and significantly reduced short tandem repeat and single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping completion and concordance rates (P < 0.0001). Increasing the amount of irradiated gDNA input into whole genome amplification improved genotyping performance of wgaDNA but not to the level of wgaDNA derived from nonirradiated gDNA. Multiple Displacement Amplification wgaDNA derived from E-beam-irradiated gDNA is not suitable for genotyping analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15824182     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0686

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  6 in total

1.  Enhancing radiation hybrid mapping through whole genome amplification.

Authors:  Genesio M Karere; Leslie A Lyons; Lutz Froenicke
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  Collection of human genomic DNA from neonates: a comparison between umbilical cord blood and buccal swabs.

Authors:  Amalia S Lehmann; David M Haas; Catherine L McCormick; Todd C Skaar; Jamie L Renbarger
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Performance of amplified DNA in an Illumina GoldenGate BeadArray assay.

Authors:  Julie M Cunningham; Thomas A Sellers; Joellen M Schildkraut; Zachary S Fredericksen; Robert A Vierkant; Linda E Kelemen; Madhura Gadre; Catherine M Phelan; Yifan Huang; Jeffrey G Meyer; V Shane Pankratz; Ellen L Goode
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Performance of whole-genome amplified DNA isolated from serum and plasma on high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays.

Authors:  Daniel T Croft; Rick M Jordan; Heather L Patney; Craig D Shriver; Marina N Vernalis; Trevor J Orchard; Darrell L Ellsworth
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  Effects of DNA mass on multiple displacement whole genome amplification and genotyping performance.

Authors:  Andrew W Bergen; Ying Qi; Kashif A Haque; Robert A Welch; Stephen J Chanock
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 2.563

6.  Caught in the middle with multiple displacement amplification: the myth of pooling for avoiding multiple displacement amplification bias in a metagenome.

Authors:  Rachel Marine; Coleen McCarren; Vansay Vorrasane; Dan Nasko; Erin Crowgey; Shawn W Polson; K Eric Wommack
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 14.650

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.