OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the lifetime cumulative number of menstrual cycles, as an index for total exposure to endogenous estrogens, and the number of menstrual cycles until a first full-term pregnancy (FFTP), are associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Population-based study with data from the Prospect-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Naturally menopausal participants were eligible (n = 6,718). The cumulative number of menstrual cycles was computed in 6,031 (90%) women. We calculated the number of cycles until FFTP among parous participants. The number of menstrual cycles was impossible to compute in women who reported to be always irregular; therefore, we added the "always irregular" category in the analysis. During the 46,746 person-years of follow-up, 168 breast cancer cases were identified. Cox regression models were used and adjustments were made to account for potential confounders. RESULTS: Even when our data does not show a clear linear gradient, we observed an increased breast cancer risk in women with a higher number of cumulative menstrual cycles in their lifetime. Using < or = 415 cycles as reference, the hazard ratio for the irregular group, 416-453, 454-490, and > or = 491 cycles was 1.11 (.56, 2.19), 1.88 (1.14, 3.12), 1.74 (1.05, 2.87), and 1.80 (1.09, 2.96), respectively. Although not statistically significant, and of less magnitude, the risk estimates for the number of cycles before FFTP showed the same tendency. CONCLUSION: Among women who underwent natural menopause, a higher number of menstrual cycles in lifetime, reflecting a longer exposure to endogenous estrogens, is associated with an increased breast cancer risk.
OBJECTIVE: To explore whether the lifetime cumulative number of menstrual cycles, as an index for total exposure to endogenous estrogens, and the number of menstrual cycles until a first full-term pregnancy (FFTP), are associated with breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. METHODS: Population-based study with data from the Prospect-European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study. Naturally menopausal participants were eligible (n = 6,718). The cumulative number of menstrual cycles was computed in 6,031 (90%) women. We calculated the number of cycles until FFTP among parous participants. The number of menstrual cycles was impossible to compute in women who reported to be always irregular; therefore, we added the "always irregular" category in the analysis. During the 46,746 person-years of follow-up, 168 breast cancer cases were identified. Cox regression models were used and adjustments were made to account for potential confounders. RESULTS: Even when our data does not show a clear linear gradient, we observed an increased breast cancer risk in women with a higher number of cumulative menstrual cycles in their lifetime. Using < or = 415 cycles as reference, the hazard ratio for the irregular group, 416-453, 454-490, and > or = 491 cycles was 1.11 (.56, 2.19), 1.88 (1.14, 3.12), 1.74 (1.05, 2.87), and 1.80 (1.09, 2.96), respectively. Although not statistically significant, and of less magnitude, the risk estimates for the number of cycles before FFTP showed the same tendency. CONCLUSION: Among women who underwent natural menopause, a higher number of menstrual cycles in lifetime, reflecting a longer exposure to endogenous estrogens, is associated with an increased breast cancer risk.
Authors: Vikki Ho; Romain Pasquet; Shaman Luo; Gang Chen; Paul Goss; Dongsheng Tu; Philip Lazarus; Harriet Richardson Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-08-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Melissa Z Braganza; Amy Berrington de González; Sara J Schonfeld; Nicolas Wentzensen; Alina V Brenner; Cari M Kitahara Journal: Cancer Prev Res (Phila) Date: 2014-01-21
Authors: Alice Zervoudakis; Howard D Strickler; Yikyung Park; Xiaonan Xue; Albert Hollenbeck; Arthur Schatzkin; Marc J Gunter Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-03-29 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Tiffany A Katz; Anna H Wu; Frank Z Stanczyk; Renwei Wang; Woon-Puay Koh; Jian-Min Yuan; Steffi Oesterreich; Lesley M Butler Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2017-11-09 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Leila Lujan-Barroso; Wei Zhang; Sara H Olson; Yu-Tang Gao; Herbert Yu; Peter A Baghurst; Paige M Bracci; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Lenka Foretová; Steven Gallinger; Ivana Holcatova; Vladimír Janout; Bu-Tian Ji; Robert C Kurtz; Carlo La Vecchia; Pagona Lagiou; Donghui Li; Anthony B Miller; Diego Serraino; Witold Zatonski; Harvey A Risch; Eric J Duell Journal: Pancreas Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Maria Elena Martinez; Betsy C Wertheim; Loki Natarajan; Richard Schwab; Melissa Bondy; Adrian Daneri-Navarro; Maria Mercedes Meza-Montenegro; Luis Enrique Gutierrez-Millan; Abenaa Brewster; Ian K Komenaka; Patricia A Thompson Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Anne Marie Zaura Jukic; Clarice R Weinberg; Allen J Wilcox; D Robert McConnaughey; Paige Hornsby; Donna D Baird Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2007-10-10 Impact factor: 4.897