PURPOSE: To measure and compare the maximum angle of ocular duction in healthy individuals as a function of age. METHODS: A calibrated arc perimeter was modified to display one of six randomly presented targets (high contrast Snellen equivalent letters), in both vertical (supra/infraduction) and horizontal (ab/adduction) gaze to the dominant eye of 204 healthy volunteers with best-corrected visual acuity. A bite-bar and headrest were employed to prevent head movement. Using a modified method of limits for discrimination threshold, a maximum mean angle of ocular duction was determined by stepping a target out in 5 degrees steps until an error was reported and thereafter bracketing around the limits of the target identification in 1 degrees steps. A mean threshold value was determined as the angle at which a subject obtained a correct response 75% of the time in two and as many as the trails in each of the four randomly presented directions of gaze (abduction, adduction, supraduction and infraduction). RESULTS: A decrease in mean maximum duction angle was found over all age groups in al four directions (p < 0.001), with a step decline beginning in the sixth decade and almost doubling in the oldest age group tested (80-95 years-olds). The percent change in mean maximum angle of duction due to age from the 14-19 to the 80-95 year-olds was: abduction 21%, adduction 24%, supraduction 35%, infraduction 26%. CONCLUSION: Baseline data are useful to differentiate normal changes occurring with age from early signs of disease. AdditIonally, disease progression and effects of treatment can be monitored.
PURPOSE: To measure and compare the maximum angle of ocular duction in healthy individuals as a function of age. METHODS: A calibrated arc perimeter was modified to display one of six randomly presented targets (high contrast Snellen equivalent letters), in both vertical (supra/infraduction) and horizontal (ab/adduction) gaze to the dominant eye of 204 healthy volunteers with best-corrected visual acuity. A bite-bar and headrest were employed to prevent head movement. Using a modified method of limits for discrimination threshold, a maximum mean angle of ocular duction was determined by stepping a target out in 5 degrees steps until an error was reported and thereafter bracketing around the limits of the target identification in 1 degrees steps. A mean threshold value was determined as the angle at which a subject obtained a correct response 75% of the time in two and as many as the trails in each of the four randomly presented directions of gaze (abduction, adduction, supraduction and infraduction). RESULTS: A decrease in mean maximum duction angle was found over all age groups in al four directions (p < 0.001), with a step decline beginning in the sixth decade and almost doubling in the oldest age group tested (80-95 years-olds). The percent change in mean maximum angle of duction due to age from the 14-19 to the 80-95 year-olds was: abduction 21%, adduction 24%, supraduction 35%, infraduction 26%. CONCLUSION: Baseline data are useful to differentiate normal changes occurring with age from early signs of disease. AdditIonally, disease progression and effects of treatment can be monitored.
Authors: Esma Islamaj; Luc Van Vught; Caroline P Jordaan-Kuip; Koenraad A Vermeer; Teresa A Ferreira; Peter W T De Waard; Hans G Lemij; Jan-Willem M Beenakker Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-10-20 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Esma Islamaj; Caroline P Jordaan-Kuip; Peter W T De Waard; Koen A Vermeer; Hans G Lemij Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 3.761