PURPOSE: The causes of the feeling of a lump in the throat (globus pharyngeus) are disputed. The symptoms are persistent and may lead clients to change their diet and suffer a reduced quality of life. Coexisting swallowing difficulties are often reported but no neurological or structural abnormality can be found. Psychological factors are likely to play a part in the condition and an eclectic approach to therapy appears to be warranted. This paper reports on a treatment programme that includes education, reassurance and the use of exercises. METHOD: Fourteen clients participated. Their progress was assessed using the Glasgow and Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS). A baseline period was used to assess the stability of their symptoms prior to therapy. This was followed by a group therapy session, use of the exercises and a further reassessment. Videofluoroscopy was conducted before and after therapy. RESULTS: Clients score on the GETS improved. However, change was seen both during the baseline and the treatment making it unclear which aspects of the treatment were effective. Improvement during the baseline suggests that clients benefit from attention and reassurance. It is unclear, therefore, whether the therapy session and the exercises provide a specific benefit or a general benefit due to continued attention. The clients' videofluoroscopies were unchanged after therapy. The presence of residue after the swallow in the valleculae and the pyriform sinuses may contribute to the symptoms of globus. CONCLUSION: The treatment is economical and appears to benefit clients. However, further research is needed to distinguish whether it has a specific effect or whether clients benefit from general attention and reassurance.
PURPOSE: The causes of the feeling of a lump in the throat (globus pharyngeus) are disputed. The symptoms are persistent and may lead clients to change their diet and suffer a reduced quality of life. Coexisting swallowing difficulties are often reported but no neurological or structural abnormality can be found. Psychological factors are likely to play a part in the condition and an eclectic approach to therapy appears to be warranted. This paper reports on a treatment programme that includes education, reassurance and the use of exercises. METHOD: Fourteen clients participated. Their progress was assessed using the Glasgow and Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS). A baseline period was used to assess the stability of their symptoms prior to therapy. This was followed by a group therapy session, use of the exercises and a further reassessment. Videofluoroscopy was conducted before and after therapy. RESULTS: Clients score on the GETS improved. However, change was seen both during the baseline and the treatment making it unclear which aspects of the treatment were effective. Improvement during the baseline suggests that clients benefit from attention and reassurance. It is unclear, therefore, whether the therapy session and the exercises provide a specific benefit or a general benefit due to continued attention. The clients' videofluoroscopies were unchanged after therapy. The presence of residue after the swallow in the valleculae and the pyriform sinuses may contribute to the symptoms of globus. CONCLUSION: The treatment is economical and appears to benefit clients. However, further research is needed to distinguish whether it has a specific effect or whether clients benefit from general attention and reassurance.