Literature DB >> 15823713

Selective reduction of estrogen receptor (ER) positive breast cancer occurrence by estrogen receptor modulators supports etiological distinction between ER positive and ER negative breast cancers.

Sven Kurbel1.   

Abstract

Reports that selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) reduce occurrence of only estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors strongly support the etiological distinction between ER positive and ER negative breast cancers. Based on these evidences three concepts are described: Concept I. The occurrence of ER negative tumor cells might be a consequence of the clonal selection among tumor cells. This would lead to mosaicism in the ER expression. If ER negative cells become the most prevalent clone, the patient will be diagnosed to have an ER negative breast cancer. Since all cancers start as ER positive, SERMs should equally prevent occurrence of ER positive and ER negative breast cancers, but this prediction is evidently wrong. Concept II. Mammary ducts normally contain ER positive and ER negative cells, both prone to malignancy. Cancer occurrence in ductal cells that normally lack ER would be unrelated to estrogen exposure or SERMs protection. Estrogen and SERMs can influence cancer occurrence only in ER positive ductal cells. The main drawback is that this concept does not predict occurrence of mosaicism in ER expression among tumor cells. Unified Concept I and II. To overcome limitations of described concept a unified concept is presented. Cancers from ER positive ductal cells start as pure ER positive tumors and those from ER negative ductal cells as pure ER negative tumors. During the preclinical phase, in some ER positive tumors, clonal selection introduces ER negative clones. These tumors become mosaic in the cellular ER expression, some of them predominantly ER positive other ER negative. Estrogen deprivation, or SERMs can help mostly to patients with pure ER positive, or mosaic ER positive tumors. Since the dominant metastatic clone can have different ER status from the primary breast tumor, both surprising successes and failures of endocrine therapy can be expected in tumors with mosaic ER expression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15823713     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2004.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  13 in total

1.  Estrogen/progesterone receptor and HER2 discordance between primary tumor and brain metastases in breast cancer and its effect on treatment and survival.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Shane Mesko; Jing Li; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; Nancy U Lin; Eric Nesbit; Tim J Kruser; Jason Chan; Steve Braunstein; Jessica Lee; John P Kirkpatrick; Will Breen; Paul D Brown; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William Sperduto; Emil Lou; Ashlyn Everett; Drexell Hunter Boggs; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Jill Remick; Kristin Plichta; John M Buatti; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; John Bryant; Michael Chuong; James Yu; Veronica Chiang; Toshimichi Nakano; Hidefumi Aoyama; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 2.  Novel therapies against aggressive and recurrent epithelial cancers by molecular targeting tumor- and metastasis-initiating cells and their progenies.

Authors:  Murielle Mimeault; Surinder K Batra
Journal:  Anticancer Agents Med Chem       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.505

Review 3.  Targeting of cancer stem/progenitor cells plus stem cell-based therapies: the ultimate hope for treating and curing aggressive and recurrent cancers.

Authors:  M Mimeault; S K Batra
Journal:  Panminerva Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.197

Review 4.  Recent advances on the molecular mechanisms involved in the drug resistance of cancer cells and novel targeting therapies.

Authors:  M Mimeault; R Hauke; S K Batra
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Oestrogen-mediated phosphorylation and stabilization of BRCA2 protein in breast.

Authors:  J L Malone; A C Nelson; R Lieberman; S Anderson; J T Holt
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Receptor Discordance of Metastatic Breast Cancer Depending on the Molecular Subtype.

Authors:  Iris Holzer; Alex Farr; Yen Tan; Christine Deutschmann; Carmen Leser; Christian F Singer
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases.

Authors:  Laurien D C Hoefnagel; Marc J van de Vijver; Henk-Jan van Slooten; Pieter Wesseling; Jelle Wesseling; Pieter J Westenend; Joost Bart; Cornelis A Seldenrijk; Iris D Nagtegaal; Joost Oudejans; Paul van der Valk; Petra van der Groep; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Heterogeneity of estrogen receptor expression in circulating tumor cells from metastatic breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Babayan; Juliane Hannemann; Julia Spötter; Volkmar Müller; Klaus Pantel; Simon A Joosse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Does confirmatory tumor biopsy alter the management of breast cancer patients with distant metastases?

Authors:  C Simmons; N Miller; W Geddie; D Gianfelice; M Oldfield; G Dranitsaris; M J Clemons
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 10.  Recent advances in cancer stem/progenitor cell research: therapeutic implications for overcoming resistance to the most aggressive cancers.

Authors:  M Mimeault; R Hauke; P P Mehta; S K Batra
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.