Literature DB >> 15823388

Pushing up smoking incidence: plans for a privatised tobacco industry in Moldova.

Anna B Gilmore1, Cornel Radu-Loghin, Irina Zatushevski, Martin McKee.   

Abstract

Moldova, one of the former Soviet republics and Europe's poorest country, has so far resisted pressure to privatise its tobacco industry. This paper examines the policies pursued by the transnational tobacco companies in Moldova in order to inform the ongoing debate about tobacco industry privatisation. We analysed relevant internal industry documents made public through litigation. The documents suggest that although a competitive tender for the state owned monopoly was later announced, British American Tobacco (BAT) and the German manufacturer Reemtsma each initially sought to secure a closed deal, with BAT accusing Reemtsma of underhand tactics. Imperial Tobacco, which now owns Reemstma, was unable to comment on these allegations as it only acquired Reemstma after the events in question. BAT sought to acquire a monopoly position, bolstered by excise rules developed by the company that would uniquely favour its products. Despite hoping to establish a monopoly, it planned intensive marketing, as if in a competitive market, aiming to target young urban dwellers, particularly opinion leaders. In so doing it predicted that smoking uptake would increase, especially among women. The documents also suggest that BAT was aware of the sensitive nature of its plans to cull the processing workforce and aimed to present "sanitised" information on future employment levels to the Moldovans. The potential for tobacco industry privatisation to undermine tobacco control and promote cigarette consumption is highlighted and is consistent with economic theory. Countries planning tobacco industry privatisation should ensure a transparent and competitive privatisation process, seek to prevent the predicted increase in consumption by implementing effective tobacco control policies and consider the impacts on employment. Multilateral financial organisations promoting tobacco industry privatisation could ensure their loan conditions protect public health by making the implementation of tobacco control policies a pre-requisite for privatisation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15823388     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)61035-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  16 in total

1.  Tobacco control in Nepal during a time of government turmoil (1960-2006).

Authors:  Dharma Bhatta; Eric Crosbie; Stella Bialous; Stanton Glantz
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sungkyu Lee; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Understanding the vector in order to plan effective tobacco control policies: an analysis of contemporary tobacco industry materials.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 4.  A review of the impacts of tobacco industry privatisation: Implications for policy.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Gary Fooks; Martin McKee
Journal:  Glob Public Health       Date:  2011

5.  Transnational tobacco company influence on tax policy during privatization of a state monopoly: British American Tobacco and Uzbekistan.

Authors:  Anna Gilmore; Jeff Collin; Joy Townsend
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  "The law was actually drafted by us but the Government is to be congratulated on its wise actions": British American Tobacco and public policy in Kenya.

Authors:  Preeti Patel; Jeff Collin; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 7.  What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Katherine E Smith; Emily Savell; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Trends in the prevalence of smoking in Russia during the transition to a market economy.

Authors:  Francesca Perlman; Martin Bobak; Anna Gilmore; Martin McKee
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.552

9.  British American Tobacco's failure in Turkey.

Authors:  S Lawrence
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 7.552

10.  The invisible hand: how British American Tobacco precluded competition in Uzbekistan.

Authors:  Anna B Gilmore; Martin McKee; Jeff Collin
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 7.552

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.