Literature DB >> 15822814

Mechanisms of face perception in humans: a magneto- and electro-encephalographic study.

Shoko Watanabe1, Kensaku Miki, Ryusuke Kakigi.   

Abstract

We have been studying the underlying mechanisms of face perception in humans using magneto- (MEG) and electro-encephalography (EEG) including (1) perception by viewing the static face, (2) differences in perception by viewing the eyes and whole face, (3) the face inversion effect, (4) the effect of gaze direction, (5) perception of eye motion, (6) perception of mouth motion, and (7) the interaction between auditory and visual stimuli related to the vowel sounds. In this review article, we mainly summarize our results obtained on 3, 5, and 6 above. With the presentation of both upright and inverted unfamiliar faces, the inferior temporal cortex (IT) centered on the fusiform gyrus, and the lateral temporal cortex (LT) near the superior temporal sulcus were activated simultaneously, but independently, between 140 and 200 ms post-stimulus. The right hemisphere IT and LT were both active in all subjects, and those in the left hemisphere in half of the subjects. Latencies with inverted faces relative to those with upright faces were longer in the right hemisphere, and shorter in the left hemisphere. Since the activated regions under upright and those under inverted face stimuli did not show a significant difference, we consider that differences in processing upright versus inverted faces are attributable to temporal processing differences rather than to processing of information by different brain regions. When viewing the motion of the mouth and eyes, a large clear MEG component, 1M (mean peak latency of approximately 160 ms), was elicited to both mouth and eye movement, and was generated mainly in the occipito-temporal border, at human MT/V5. The 1M to mouth movement and the 1M to eye movement showed no significant difference in amplitude or generator location. Therefore, our results indicate that human MT/V5 is active in the perception of both mouth and eye motion, and that the perception of movement of facial parts is probably processed similarly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15822814     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2004.00603.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropathology        ISSN: 0919-6544            Impact factor:   1.906


  9 in total

1.  Differential priming effects of color-opponent subliminal stimulation on visual magnetic responses.

Authors:  Minoru Hoshiyama; Ryusuke Kakigi; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Kensaku Miki; Shoko Watanabe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effect of configural distortion on a face-related ERP evoked by random dots blinking.

Authors:  Kensaku Miki; Shoko Watanabe; Yasuyuki Takeshima; Mika Teruya; Yukiko Honda; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A magnetoencephalographic study of face processing: M170, gamma-band oscillations and source localization.

Authors:  Zaifeng Gao; Abraham Goldstein; Yuval Harpaz; Myriam Hansel; Elana Zion-Golumbic; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Early (M170) activation of face-specific cortex by face-like objects.

Authors:  Nouchine Hadjikhani; Kestutis Kveraga; Paulami Naik; Seppo P Ahlfors
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  Human Scalp Electroencephalography Reveals that Repetition Suppression Varies with Expectation.

Authors:  Christopher Summerfield; Valentin Wyart; Vanessa Mareike Johnen; Vincent de Gardelle
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Maturational trajectory of fusiform gyrus neural activity when viewing faces: From 4 months to 4 years old.

Authors:  Yuhan Chen; Olivia Allison; Heather L Green; Emily S Kuschner; Song Liu; Mina Kim; Michelle Slinger; Kylie Mol; Taylor Chiang; Luke Bloy; Timothy P L Roberts; J Christopher Edgar
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  MEG and EEG data fusion: simultaneous localisation of face-evoked responses.

Authors:  Richard N Henson; Elias Mouchlianitis; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-05-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Selecting forward models for MEG source-reconstruction using model-evidence.

Authors:  R N Henson; J Mattout; C Phillips; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  The sequence of cortical activity inferred by response latency variability in the human ventral pathway of face processing.

Authors:  Jo-Fu Lotus Lin; Juan Silva-Pereyra; Chih-Che Chou; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.