Literature DB >> 15822679

[Criteria how to choose adequate methodology and relevant variables for assessment of quality of primary healthcare].

Selim Toromanović1, Izet Masić, Ahmed Novo, Mensura Kudumović, Lejla Zunić.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Research of satisfaction of patients in the area of primary health care (PHC) and especially criteria how to choose best methodology and the relevant variables guided to the situation where activities were focused on description of the basic structure and processes of health care rather than on identification of needs for services and on result based assessment and satisfaction of patients with provided service. To give advantage to any of methodologies is inexplicable problem and depend of factors beyond of health service control.
PURPOSE: Aim of this paper is to review existing measurements of healthcare for ones who intend to use measurements of quality of healthcare for clinical and research purposes and to recommend criteria how to choose adequate methodology and relevant variables for assessment of quality of primary healthcare.
METHODOLOGY: For our study we used experience of the Cathedra for Medical Informatics, Medical faculty, University of Sarajevo with emphasis on research of quality of PHC. We selected over 3,000 users of PHC (patients-adults) in PHC units in ten cantons of Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
RESULTS: Statistically significant results we got when we crossed general attitude of patients about quality of healthcare with the following variables: place where patient receive healthcare, consultation with patients about patients' rights and life styles. We have not got statistically significant results when we crossed the following variables with general attitude of patients: distance from place of living to place where patients get healthcare, examination schedule in the units of PHC, continuity of healthcare, organization of field service and possibility to choose physician or nurse.
CONCLUSION: Very often researchers create their own methods of measurement instead to carry out systematic review of existing ones to enable them to find appropriate one. In this paper we recommended guidelines for finding the most appropriate methods of health measurement using experience of the Cathedra for Medical Informatics, Medical faculty in Sarajevo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15822679

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Arh        ISSN: 0350-199X


  5 in total

1.  An Overview of Human Resources and Capacity in Health Care Institutions in the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Context of Responding to the COVID 19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Seila Cilovic-Lagarija; Nino Hasanica; Maida Mulic; Milan Radojicic; Suada Brankovic; Aida Pilav; Senad Huseinagic; Sanjin Musa
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2021-03

2.  Intrafamilial Spread of COVID-19 Infection Within Population in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

Authors:  Nizama Salihefendic; Muharem Zildzic; Haris Huseinagic; Sead Ahmetagic; Dzenita Salihefendic; Izet Masic
Journal:  Mater Sociomed       Date:  2021-03

3.  Assessment of Medical Records Module of Health Information System According to ISO 9241-10.

Authors:  Asghar Ehteshami; Farahnaz Sadoughi; Saeed Saeedbakhsh; Mahtab Kasaei Isfahani
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2013-03

4.  A Survey on Clients' Opinions in Isfahan's Public Hospitals About Effective Factors in the Fulfillment of Referral System.

Authors:  Asadollah Shams; Hassan Ashrafi-rizzi; Saeed Afrough; Marzieh Javadi; Amin Shams
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2013-03

5.  District health information system assessment: a case study in iran.

Authors:  Ahmad Reza Raeisi; Sakineh Saghaeiannejad; Saeed Karimi; Asghar Ehteshami; Mahtab Kasaei
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2013-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.