Literature DB >> 15822387

[Complications of Bricker ileal conduit urinary diversion: analysis of a series of 246 patients].

Jean-François Hétet1, Jérôme Rigaud, Georges Karam, Pascal Glémain, Loïc Le Normand, Olivier Bouchot, Jean-Claude Le Néel, Jean-Marie Buzelin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the mortality and early and late morbidities of Bricker ileal conduit urinary diversion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1990 and December 2002, 246 Bricker ileal conduit urinary diversion was performed in our centre in 164 males (67%) and 82 females (33%) with a mean age of 64 years (range: 9 to 90 years). Bricker diversion was performed in 73.6% of cases for underlying tumour (prostate, bladder, cervical, colon cancer), and in 26.4% of cases for benign disease (neurogenic bladder radiation bladder bladder exstrophy, incrusting cystitis). Cystectomy was associated with Bricker diversion in 62.2% of cases. The mean follow-up was 24 months (range: 1 to 151 months). The following parameters were studied: mortality and early and late medical or surgical, urological and gastrointestinal complications.
RESULTS: The postoperative mortality was 6.9% (17 deaths, 16 in patients in whom Bricker diversion was performed for cancer). The early morbidity was marked by gastrointestinal complications (ileus, fistula, evisceration) in 46 cases (1.7%), 25 of which required re-operation. A medical complication was observed in 41 patients (16.7% of the series), responsible for 60% of the postoperative mortality (10 of the 17 deaths). A urinary fistula was observed in 7 patients (2.8%). The late morbidity consisted of parietal complications (incisional hernia, peristomal hernia, stricture of the stoma) in 18.3% of cases. Urological complications consisted of acute pyelonephritis (11%), ureteroileal stricture (4.9%) and urinary stones (4.9%).
CONCLUSION: Bricker ileal conduit urinary diversion is associated with considerable mortality, especially in cancer patients. Early complications are essentially gastrointestinal, while late complications tend to be parietal or urological.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15822387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Urol        ISSN: 1166-7087            Impact factor:   0.915


  4 in total

1.  Large bifid ureteric calculus in a patient with an ileal conduit.

Authors:  Shanmugasundaram Rajaian; Nitin S Kekre
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2012-09

2.  Use of a long-term metal stent in complex uretero-ileal anastomotic stricture.

Authors:  Mohammed N Kabir; Christian Bach; Stefanos Kachrilas; Faruquz Zaman; Islam Junaid; Noor Buchholz; Junaid Masood
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2011-09-15

3.  Use of the Memokath Urethral Stent in the management of ileal conduit stomal stenosis.

Authors:  Tzong-Yang Pan; Ahmad Al-Sameraaii
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-24

4.  Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Partial Colpectomy and Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit Urinary Diversion (Bricker) for Cervical Adenocarcinoma Recurrence.

Authors:  Jennifer Uzan; Caroline Cornou; Chérazade Bensaid; François Audenet; Charlotte Ngô; Anne-Sophie Bats; Fabrice Lecuru
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-11-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.