Literature DB >> 15822055

Communicating prognosis in the dialysis consent process: a patient-centered, guideline-supported approach.

Donna M Michel1, Alvin H Moss.   

Abstract

Recent guidelines recommend shared decision making between patients and nephrologists as the model for dialysis decision making. A key component of this shared decision making is obtaining informed consent. As part of this process, nephrologists have an obligation to inform patients with chronic kidney disease of their prognosis. Ideally, patients themselves should be involved in the decision-making process; however, some patients will not possess decision-making capacity, and others may be unwilling to participate. Determining what to tell patients about prognosis requires tailoring the conversation to the individual patient's preferences. Conversations about prognosis need to occur in a timely fashion so that patients have the opportunity to consider options and make decisions before dialysis is inevitable. Communication strategies are available to assist nephrologists in breaking the bad news of the need for dialysis and its associated burdens. The approach described in this article should help nephrologists discuss prognosis with their patients in a way that is patient centered and in accordance with clinical practice guideline recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15822055     DOI: 10.1053/j.ackd.2005.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis        ISSN: 1548-5595            Impact factor:   3.620


  7 in total

1.  Prediction of Risk of Death for Patients Starting Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ryan T Anderson; Hailey Cleek; Atieh S Pajouhi; M Fernanda Bellolio; Ananya Mayukha; Allyson Hart; LaTonya J Hickson; Molly A Feely; Michael E Wilson; Ryan M Giddings Connolly; Patricia J Erwin; Abdul M Majzoub; Navdeep Tangri; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 8.237

2.  Time to Improve Informed Consent for Dialysis: An International Perspective.

Authors:  Frank Brennan; Cameron Stewart; Hannah Burgess; Sara N Davison; Alvin H Moss; Fliss E M Murtagh; Michael Germain; Shelley Tranter; Mark Brown
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Race and shared decision-making: perspectives of African-Americans with diabetes.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Angela Odoms-Young; Michael T Quinn; Rita Gorawara-Bhat; Shannon C Wilson; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Older Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease and Their Perspectives on Prognostic Information: a Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Nataly R Espinoza Suarez; Susan Curtis; Annika T Beck; Ian Hargraves; Kevin Shaw; Susan P Y Wong; LaTonya J Hickson; Kasey R Boehmer; Brigid Amberg; Erin Dahlen; Cristina Wirtz; Robert C Albright; Ashok Kumbamu; Jon C Tilburt; Erica J Sutton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 6.473

5.  Predicting six-month mortality for patients who are on maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Lewis M Cohen; Robin Ruthazer; Alvin H Moss; Michael J Germain
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Supportive Care: Time to Change Our Prognostic Tools and Their Use in CKD.

Authors:  Cécile Couchoud; Brenda Hemmelgarn; Peter Kotanko; Michael J Germain; Olivier Moranne; Sara N Davison
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 8.237

7.  Validation of prognostic indices for short term mortality in an incident dialysis population of older adults >75.

Authors:  Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; LaTonya J Hickson; Rachel Giblon; Atieh Pajouhi; Natalie Connell; Megan Branda; Amrit K Vasdev; Rozalina G McCoy; Ladan Zand; Navdeep Tangri; Nilay D Shah
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.