RATIONALE: The CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A reduces food intake in rats. This effect is likely to depend on modulation of reward related processes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of SR141716A on responding for food under a second order instrumental task in which responding and consumption of food can be separated, and on Pavlovian responding for a stimulus predictive of food reward. METHODS: Instrumental responding and pellet consumption following administration of SR141716A (0-3 mg/kg) were recorded under an FI5 min FR5(5:S) operant schedule that incorporates both a 5 min initial appetitive phase and a 25 min consummatory phase. We compared the drug-induced change in responding to that recorded following a reduction in motivational state induced by pre-feeding. In a second experiment we assessed the effects of SR141716A (0-3 mg/kg) on Pavlovian approach behaviour for a stimulus (lever) associated with food reward (CS+) and a neutral stimulus (lever) not associated with reward (CS-). RESULTS: SR141716A reduced pellet consumption and instrumental responding during both the appetitive and consummatory phases of the second order schedule. Pre-feeding had a similar effect on responding during the appetitive phase, suggesting an effect on incentive motivation. SR141716A also blocked an enhancement of responding that occurred during the consummatory phase in pre-fed animals. SR141716A and pre-feeding had no effect on responding in the Pavlovian autoshaping paradigm. CONCLUSIONS: SR141716A impacts on motivational processes in both the appetitive and consummatory phases of feeding behaviour.
RATIONALE: The CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A reduces food intake in rats. This effect is likely to depend on modulation of reward related processes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of SR141716A on responding for food under a second order instrumental task in which responding and consumption of food can be separated, and on Pavlovian responding for a stimulus predictive of food reward. METHODS: Instrumental responding and pellet consumption following administration of SR141716A (0-3 mg/kg) were recorded under an FI5 min FR5(5:S) operant schedule that incorporates both a 5 min initial appetitive phase and a 25 min consummatory phase. We compared the drug-induced change in responding to that recorded following a reduction in motivational state induced by pre-feeding. In a second experiment we assessed the effects of SR141716A (0-3 mg/kg) on Pavlovian approach behaviour for a stimulus (lever) associated with food reward (CS+) and a neutral stimulus (lever) not associated with reward (CS-). RESULTS:SR141716A reduced pellet consumption and instrumental responding during both the appetitive and consummatory phases of the second order schedule. Pre-feeding had a similar effect on responding during the appetitive phase, suggesting an effect on incentive motivation. SR141716A also blocked an enhancement of responding that occurred during the consummatory phase in pre-fed animals. SR141716A and pre-feeding had no effect on responding in the Pavlovian autoshaping paradigm. CONCLUSIONS:SR141716A impacts on motivational processes in both the appetitive and consummatory phases of feeding behaviour.
Authors: T J De Vries; Y Shaham; J R Homberg; H Crombag; K Schuurman; J Dieben; L J Vanderschuren; A N Schoffelmeer Journal: Nat Med Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Taco J De Vries; Judith R Homberg; Rob Binnekade; Halfdan Raasø; Anton N M Schoffelmeer Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2003-04-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Zoë D Thornton-Jones; Guy A Kennett; Steven P Vickers; Peter G Clifton Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2007-03-20 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Maria Flavia Barbano; Anna Castañé; Elena Martín-García; Rafael Maldonado Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2009-05-19 Impact factor: 4.530