Literature DB >> 15821692

Prospective clinical trial comparing the effects of conventional Twin-block and mini-block appliances: Part 2. Soft tissue changes.

Ashvin A Sharma1, Robert T Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aims of this prospective clinical trial were to compare the soft tissue effects of Twin-block (TB) and mini-block (MB) functional appliances by using lateral cephalograms and optical surface laser scans and to evaluate the extent of posttreatment relapse with both appliances. MATERIAL: Seventy Class II Division 1 patients meeting set inclusion criteria were matched by age and sex. The matched pairs were randomly allocated to treatment with either the TB or the MB appliance. The appliances were worn full time for 9 months (phase I), followed by a 3-month observation phase of no appliance wear (phase II). Lateral cephalograms were taken at the start of treatment and at 12 months, and laser scans were taken at 0, 3, 9, and 12 months.
RESULTS: Radiographically, there was a greater advancement of the soft tissue pogonion in the TB group (median, TB: 4.0 mm; MB: 1.8 mm; P = .004), whereas the soft tissue anterior face height increased similarly in both groups (median, TB: 4.4 mm; MB: 4.3 mm). Optical surface scans confirmed the cephalometric changes. There were a greater forward movement of soft tissue pogonion in the TB group during active treatment (median change, TB: 3.2 mm; MB: 3.9 mm) and similar increases in the soft tissue total anterior face height (median change, TB: 3.2 mm; MB: 3.9 mm). There were negative changes of soft tissue pogonion (median, TB: -1.0 mm; MB: -0.9 mm) and vertical face height (median change, TB: -0.7; MB: -0.6) during phase II.
CONCLUSIONS: The TB appliance produced the greater overall change in the soft tissue profile. However, there were clinically significant relapse changes in the immediate postfunctional phase.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821692     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.03.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of soft tissue changes one year post-treatment in Twin Block and FORSUS FRD treated patients.

Authors:  Dinesh Chander Chaudhary; Prasanna Kumar; Mohit Sharma; Karan Nehra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-12-15

2.  Soft Tissue Esthetic Changes Following a Modified Twin Block Appliance Therapy: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Mohamadreza Shahamfar; Mohamad Hossein A Atashi; Niloofar Azima
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2020 May-Jun

3.  Predictors of favorable soft tissue profile outcomes following Class II Twin-block treatment.

Authors:  Ji-Eun Kim; Su-Jung Mah; Tae-Woo Kim; Su-Jung Kim; Ki-Ho Park; Yoon-Goo Kang
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-11-19       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Class II malocclusion occlusal severity description.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Renata Sathler; Thais Maria Freire Fernandes; Marcelo Zanda; Arnaldo Pinzan
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.

Authors:  Stjepan Spalj; Kate Mroz Tranesen; Kari Birkeland; Visnja Katic; Andrej Pavlic; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.