Literature DB >> 15821566

Buried penis: congenital syndrome of a short penile shaft and a paucity of penile shaft skin.

John F Redman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The term "buried penis" has been applied to a variety of penile abnormalities and includes an apparent buried penis that is obvious at birth. The purpose of this study was to examine prospectively the congenital buried penis and to evaluate an operative technique for its management.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 31 males 2 to 28 months old (mean age 12.3 months) with a congenital buried penis underwent surgical correction of the anomaly. Measurements were made of the penile shaft skin, inner leaf of the prepuce, glans length and stretched penile length. Observations of the subcutaneous tissue of the penis were made. The outer leaf of the prepuce was resected, following which covering of the penile shaft was accomplished with a combination of the penile shaft skin and the inner leaf of the prepuce.
RESULTS: Stretched penile lengths ranged from 2.3 to 4.1 cm (mean 3.1). The glans length from the tip of the glans dorsally to the corona ranged from 0.9 to 1.6 cm (mean 1.2). The inner leaf of the prepuce ranged from 0.9 to 2.2 cm (mean 1.5) in length, while the dorsal penile skin lengths were 1 to 1.6 cm (mean 0.8). In all patients complete shaft coverage was accomplished using a combination of varying degrees of penile shaft skin and inner leaf of the prepuce. In no case was there a requirement for either unfurling of the inner and outer leaf of the prepuce or mobilization of scrotal flaps to accomplish shaft coverage. All patients healed well and have done well with a followup of 6 months to 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: Congenital buried penis is a syndrome consisting of a paucity of penile shaft skin and a short penile shaft. The anomaly may be successfully repaired by carefully preserving a length of inner leaf of the prepuce sufficient to cover, in some instances, the length of the penile shaft. Anchoring of the penile skin to the shaft is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821566     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154781.98966.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  11 in total

1.  A modified surgical procedure for concealed penis.

Authors:  Gong Cheng; Bianjiang Liu; Zhaolong Guan; Yuan Huang; Chao Qin; Ninghong Song; Zengjun Wang
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  [The buried penis : Indications, a new technique and the results].

Authors:  S Riechardt; M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Penoplasty--Not Circumcision--for Buried Penis.

Authors:  M V Vincent; S E Dundas Byles; N D Duncan
Journal:  West Indian Med J       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 0.171

Review 4.  The inconspicuous penis in children.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Pieralba Catalano; Rita Ortolano; Mario Giuffrè
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Minimally invasive technique for the concealed penis lead to longer penile length.

Authors:  Weimin Yu; Fan Cheng; Xiaobin Zhang; Yuan Ruan; Sixing Yang; Yue Xia
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Longer length improvement and more covert incision: a single-center, prospective study of two innovative surgical methods "one stitch" and "four stitch" for pediatric buried penis.

Authors:  Junhao Lei; Chunhua Luo; Songtao Cheng; Wen Yan; Xinghuan Wang; Xinjun Su
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Penoplasty for buried penis in infants and children: report of 100 cases.

Authors:  Lena Perger; Robert S Hanley; Neil R Feins
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.827

8.  Effects of modified penoplasty for concealed penis in children.

Authors:  Chao Chen; Ning Li; Yi-Ge Luo; Hong Wang; Xian-Ming Tang; Jia-Bo Chen; Chun-Qiang Dong; Qiang Liu; Kun Dong; Cheng Su; Ti-Quan Yang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  [Comparison of pedicled skin flap of foreskin for phalloplasty and Sugita surgical method in treatment of complete concealed penis].

Authors:  Ao Xu; Xue Li; Zhibo Zhang; Li Zeng; Yidong Huang; Xue Ma; Lugang Huang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-11-15

10.  Simple anchoring of the penopubic skin to the prepubic deep fascia in surgical correction of buried penis.

Authors:  Eun-Hong Jung; Jeong-Hwan Son; Seok-Heun Jang; Jae-Won Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2011-11-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.