Literature DB >> 15821547

No-needle jet anesthetic technique for no-scalpel vasectomy.

Ronald S Weiss1, Philip S Li.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe a new, modified jet injection technique for local anesthesia for no-scalpel vasectomy without the use of a needle, which may minimize the fear of vasectomy in men due to the needle involved in local anesthesia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MadaJet Medical Injector (MADA Medical Products, Carlstadt. New Jersey) was used in this study to deliver a high pressure spray of 0.1 cc local anesthetic solution directly through the scrotal skin down onto the tissue around the vas. Two or 3 jet injections are delivered to each vas and a total of 4 to 6 suffice for the entire vasectomy.
RESULTS: No-needle jet injection is remarkably effective for local anesthesia for no-scalpel vasectomy. The average volume of anesthetic solution per jet injection is 0.1 cc with 0.2 to 0.3 cc for each vas. Onset is almost immediate, within 10 to 20 seconds after injection. About 465 patients were anesthetized by the jet injection technique with great satisfaction. The average visual analog scale score for the pain of the jet injection itself was 1.71 of 10. The average visual analog scale score for the pain of subsequent vasectomy during the surgical procedure was 0.66 of 10 (median 0.2). No hematomas were noted. Patients experience the mild discomfort of a pinch, not unlike a rubber band, with the first injection.
CONCLUSIONS: No-needle anesthesia with jet injection is a new technique to deliver rapid onset of profound local anesthesia to the patient undergoing vasectomy. It is a simple and safe approach with high patient satisfaction, as reflected in low pain scores. The benefit of this technique without a needle is that it may decrease the fear of pain in men and enhance the popularity of vasectomy worldwide.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15821547     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000154698.03817.d4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

Review 1.  The ShangRing device for simplified adult circumcision.

Authors:  Puneet Masson; Philip S Li; Mark A Barone; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Vasectomy techniques--need for better occlusion methods.

Authors:  David C Sokal
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  [Vasectomy : Current information].

Authors:  Thomas Kreutzig-Langenfeld; Ekaterina Lellig; Peter Hinz; Fabian Zilg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Vasectomy and vasectomy reversal: An update.

Authors:  Ranjith Ramasamy; Peter N Schlegel
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2011-01

5.  Comparison of traditional anesthesia method and jet injector anesthesia method (MadaJet XL®) for Nexplanon® insertion and removal.

Authors:  G Anthony Wilson; Julie W Jeter; William S Dabbs; Amy Barger Stevens; Robert E Heidel; Shaunta' M Chamberlin
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2020-02-24

Review 6.  Vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: Review of the procedures, outcomes, and predictors of patency and pregnancy over the last decade.

Authors:  Takeshi Namekawa; Takashi Imamoto; Mayuko Kato; Akira Komiya; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2018-05-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.