OBJECTIVE: To evaluate atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) (300/100 mg) once daily, atazanavir/saquinavir (ATV/SQV) (400/1200 mg) once daily, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) (400/100 mg) twice daily, each with tenofovir (300 mg) once daily and a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients. METHODS: Randomized, open-label, 48-week multicenter trial of 358 randomized adult patients who had failed two or more prior HAART regimens with baseline HIV RNA > or = 1000 copies/ml and CD4 cell count > or = 50 x 10(6) cells/l. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint [plasma HIV RNA reduction assessed by time-averaged difference (TAD)] was similar for ATV/RTV and LPV/RTV [TAD 0.13; 97.5% confidence interval, -0.12 to 0.39] at 48 weeks. Mean reductions from baseline for ATV/RTV and LPV/RTV were comparable at 1.93 and 1.87 log10 copies/ml, respectively. Mean CD4 cell count increases were 110 and 121 x 10(6) cells/l for ATV/RTV, and LPV/RTV, respectively. The efficacy of ATV/SQV was lower than LPV/RTV by both these parameters. Declines in total cholesterol and fasting triglycerides were greater with ATV/RTV and ATV/SQV than with LPV/RTV (P < or = 0.005). Lipids in the LPV/RTV arm at week 48 generally increased from baseline. Lipid-lowering agents were used more frequently in the LPV/RTV arm than in the ATV arms (P < 0.05 versus ATV/RTV), as were antidiarrheal agents (P < or = 0.04 versus both ATV treatments). No new or unique safety findings emerged. CONCLUSIONS: ATV boosted with RTV is as effective and well tolerated as LPV/RTV in treatment-experienced patients, with a more favorable impact on serum lipids. Pharmacokinetically enhanced ATV provides a suitable choice for therapy of treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/RTV) (300/100 mg) once daily, atazanavir/saquinavir (ATV/SQV) (400/1200 mg) once daily, and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/RTV) (400/100 mg) twice daily, each with tenofovir (300 mg) once daily and a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor in treatment-experienced HIV-infectedpatients. METHODS: Randomized, open-label, 48-week multicenter trial of 358 randomized adult patients who had failed two or more prior HAART regimens with baseline HIV RNA > or = 1000 copies/ml and CD4 cell count > or = 50 x 10(6) cells/l. RESULTS: The primary efficacy endpoint [plasma HIV RNA reduction assessed by time-averaged difference (TAD)] was similar for ATV/RTV and LPV/RTV [TAD 0.13; 97.5% confidence interval, -0.12 to 0.39] at 48 weeks. Mean reductions from baseline for ATV/RTV and LPV/RTV were comparable at 1.93 and 1.87 log10 copies/ml, respectively. Mean CD4 cell count increases were 110 and 121 x 10(6) cells/l for ATV/RTV, and LPV/RTV, respectively. The efficacy of ATV/SQV was lower than LPV/RTV by both these parameters. Declines in total cholesterol and fasting triglycerides were greater with ATV/RTV and ATV/SQV than with LPV/RTV (P < or = 0.005). Lipids in the LPV/RTV arm at week 48 generally increased from baseline. Lipid-lowering agents were used more frequently in the LPV/RTV arm than in the ATV arms (P < 0.05 versus ATV/RTV), as were antidiarrheal agents (P < or = 0.04 versus both ATV treatments). No new or unique safety findings emerged. CONCLUSIONS:ATV boosted with RTV is as effective and well tolerated as LPV/RTV in treatment-experienced patients, with a more favorable impact on serum lipids. Pharmacokinetically enhanced ATV provides a suitable choice for therapy of treatment-experienced HIV-infectedpatients.
Authors: Regina B Osih; Patrick Taffé; Martin Rickenbach; Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Luigia Elzi; Christoph Fux; Milos Opravil; Enos Bernasconi; Patrick Schmid; Huldrych F Günthard; Matthias Cavassini Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-10-07 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Bethany L Morris; Callie A Scott; Timothy J Wilkin; Paul E Sax; Roy M Gulick; Kenneth A Freedberg; Bruce R Schackman Journal: HIV Clin Trials Date: 2012 Jan-Feb
Authors: Pyoeng Gyun Choe; Wan Beom Park; Jin Su Song; Nak-Hyun Kim; Kyoung-Ho Song; Sang Won Park; Hong Bin Kim; Nam Joong Kim; Myoung-don Oh Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Edward P Acosta; Michelle A Kendall; John G Gerber; Beverly Alston-Smith; Susan L Koletar; Andrew R Zolopa; Sangeeta Agarwala; Michael Child; Richard Bertz; Lara Hosey; David W Haas Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Bruce R Schackman; Callie A Scott; Paul E Sax; Elena Losina; Timothy J Wilkin; John E McKinnon; Susan Swindells; Milton C Weinstein; Kenneth A Freedberg Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2007-09-04 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Monique R Ferguson; Xueliang Han; Greg McMillan; Marty St Clair; Keith A Pappa; Daniel R McClernon; William A O'Brien Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-12-15 Impact factor: 3.731