BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Imatinib induces complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) in the majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). However, a subgroup of patients is refractory at the cytogenetic level. Clinically, it would be advantageous to identify such patients a priori, since they may benefit from more aggressive therapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: To elucidate mechanisms underlying cytogenetic refractoriness, we used Affymetrix oligonucleotide arrays to determine the transcriptional signature associated with cytogenetic refractoriness in unselected white blood or bone marrow cells from 29 patients with CML in first CP prior to treatment with imatinib. Patients with CCR within 9 months were defined as responders (n = 16) and patients lacking a major cytogenetic response (> 35% Philadelphia-positive metaphases) after 1 year were defined as non-responders (n = 13). RESULTS: Differences in gene expression between responders and non-responders were subtle. Stringent statistical analysis with multiple comparison adjustments revealed very few differentially expressed genes. Differentially expressed genes could not be confirmed in an independent test set. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that transcriptional profiling of unselected white cells is of limited value for identifying genes consistently associated with cytogenetic refractoriness to imatinib.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES:Imatinib induces complete cytogenetic responses (CCR) in the majority of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase (CP). However, a subgroup of patients is refractory at the cytogenetic level. Clinically, it would be advantageous to identify such patients a priori, since they may benefit from more aggressive therapy. DESIGN AND METHODS: To elucidate mechanisms underlying cytogenetic refractoriness, we used Affymetrix oligonucleotide arrays to determine the transcriptional signature associated with cytogenetic refractoriness in unselected white blood or bone marrow cells from 29 patients with CML in first CP prior to treatment with imatinib. Patients with CCR within 9 months were defined as responders (n = 16) and patients lacking a major cytogenetic response (> 35% Philadelphia-positive metaphases) after 1 year were defined as non-responders (n = 13). RESULTS: Differences in gene expression between responders and non-responders were subtle. Stringent statistical analysis with multiple comparison adjustments revealed very few differentially expressed genes. Differentially expressed genes could not be confirmed in an independent test set. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that transcriptional profiling of unselected white cells is of limited value for identifying genes consistently associated with cytogenetic refractoriness to imatinib.
Authors: Chung H Kok; David T Yeung; Liu Lu; Dale B Watkins; Tamara M Leclercq; Phuong Dang; Verity A Saunders; John Reynolds; Deborah L White; Timothy P Hughes Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2019-05-28
Authors: Nicolas Borisov; Victor Tkachev; Maria Suntsova; Olga Kovalchuk; Alex Zhavoronkov; Ilya Muchnik; Anton Buzdin Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2018-01-17 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: Shannon K McWeeney; Lucy C Pemberton; Marc M Loriaux; Kristina Vartanian; Stephanie G Willis; Gregory Yochum; Beth Wilmot; Yaron Turpaz; Raji Pillai; Brian J Druker; Jennifer L Snead; Mary MacPartlin; Stephen G O'Brien; Junia V Melo; Thoralf Lange; Christina A Harrington; Michael W N Deininger Journal: Blood Date: 2009-10-16 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Wenyong W Zhang; Jorge E Cortes; Hui Yao; Li Zhang; Neelima G Reddy; Elias Jabbour; Hagop M Kantarjian; Dan Jones Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: David M Levine; David R Haynor; John C Castle; Sergey B Stepaniants; Matteo Pellegrini; Mao Mao; Jason M Johnson Journal: Genome Biol Date: 2006-10-17 Impact factor: 13.583