Literature DB >> 15820839

Reconsidering the role of personality in placebo effects: dispositional optimism, situational expectations, and the placebo response.

Andrew L Geers1, Suzanne G Helfer, Kristin Kosbab, Paul E Weiland, Sarah J Landry.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prior investigations have failed to find reliable personality differences in placebo responding. The present study tests the hypothesis that personality and situational variables interact to determine placebo responding.
METHODS: Optimists and pessimists were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. In the first condition, the participants were told that they were to ingest a pill that would make them feel unpleasant (deceptive-expectation group). In the second condition, the participants were told that they were to ingest a pill that would make them feel either unpleasant or was an inactive substance (conditional-expectation group). Finally, a third group was told they were to ingest a pill that was inactive (control group).
RESULTS: Pessimists were more likely than optimists to follow a negative-placebo expectation when given a deceptive expectation, but not when given a conditional expectation.
CONCLUSION: The personality variable optimism-pessimism relates to placebo responding when individuals are given a deceptive but not a conditional expectation. This suggests that personality and situational variables interact to determine placebo responding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820839     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2004.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Res        ISSN: 0022-3999            Impact factor:   3.006


  53 in total

Review 1.  The placebo effect: advances from different methodological approaches.

Authors:  Karin Meissner; Ulrike Bingel; Luana Colloca; Tor D Wager; Alison Watson; Magne Arve Flaten
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Getting the pain you expect: mechanisms of placebo, nocebo and reappraisal effects in humans.

Authors:  Irene Tracey
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 53.440

3.  Expectations and placebo response: a laboratory investigation into the role of somatic focus.

Authors:  Andrew L Geers; Suzanne G Helfer; Paul E Weiland; Kristin Kosbab
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2005-12-23

Review 4.  Placebo effects: clinical aspects and neurobiology.

Authors:  Barry S Oken
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 13.501

Review 5.  Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Anna von Lilienfeld-Toal; Imis Dogan; Franziska Schreiber; Stefan G Hofmann; Arthur J Barsky; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Behavioral factors in the placebo response.

Authors:  R E Weeks; E Newman
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Predicting individual differences in placebo analgesia: contributions of brain activity during anticipation and pain experience.

Authors:  Tor D Wager; Lauren Y Atlas; Lauren A Leotti; James K Rilling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 8.  Motivation and placebos: do different mechanisms occur in different contexts?

Authors:  Michael E Hyland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 9.  Understanding placebo and nocebo responses for pain management.

Authors:  Luana Colloca; Christian Grillon
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2014-06

Review 10.  Placebo: misunderstandings and prejudices.

Authors:  Matthias Breidert; Karl Hofbauer
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-11-13       Impact factor: 5.594

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.