Literature DB >> 15820788

Research on infertility: which definition should we use?

Ulla Larsen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Different definitions of infertility are used in clinical practice as well as in epidemiological and demographic research. This study assessed whether the definition makes a difference for estimates of the prevalence and sociodemographic differentials of infertility and whether one definition would be applicable in both research and clinical practice.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Moshi town in northern Tanzania. PATIENT(S): Community-based sample of 1,125 women, ages 20 to 44 years, in first union. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Six definitions of infertility. RESULT(S): Similar levels and sociodemographic characteristics of infertile women were obtained from asking the question "How long have you tried to get pregnant?" and from secondary data collected in a birth history that included date of marriage, date of last birth, current contraceptive use, and whether the woman wants another child. CONCLUSION(S): The infertility definition made a difference. The World Health Organization definition based on 24 months of trying to get pregnant is recommended as the definition that is useful in clinical practice and research among different disciplines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820788     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  23 in total

1.  "Research on Infertility: Definition Makes a Difference" Revisited.

Authors:  Melanie H Jacobson; Helen B Chin; Ann C Mertens; Jessica B Spencer; Amy Fothergill; Penelope P Howards
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Measuring infertility: searching for consensus.

Authors:  Marie Thoma
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.681

3.  Low-level arsenic exposure via drinking water consumption and female fecundity - A preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Michele L Susko; Michael S Bloom; Iulia A Neamtiu; Allison A Appleton; Simona Surdu; Cristian Pop; Edward F Fitzgerald; Doru Anastasiu; Eugen S Gurzau
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.498

4.  Ficus platyphylla promotes fertility in female Rattus norvegicus Wistar strain: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Chinenye J Ugwah-Oguejiofor; Shaibu O Bello; Raymond U Okolo; Emmanuel U Etuk; Michael O Ugwah; Vincent U Igbokwe
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Definitions and the experience of fertility problems: infertile and sub-fertile women, childless mothers, and honorary mothers in two southern Nigerian communities.

Authors:  Bruce Whitehouse; Marida Hollos
Journal:  Med Anthropol Q       Date:  2014-02-27

6.  Is infertility resolution associated with a change in women's well-being?

Authors:  Karina M Shreffler; Arthur L Greil; Stacy M Tiemeyer; Julia McQuillan
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  A New Way to Estimate the Potential Unmet Need for Infertility Services Among Women in the United States.

Authors:  Arthur L Greil; Kathleen S Slauson-Blevins; Stacy Tiemeyer; Julia McQuillan; Karina M Shreffler
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Measuring infertility in populations: constructing a standard definition for use with demographic and reproductive health surveys.

Authors:  Maya N Mascarenhas; Hoiwan Cheung; Colin D Mathers; Gretchen A Stevens
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2012-08-31

9.  Comparison of the fertility of tumor suppressor gene-deficient C57BL/6 mouse strains reveals stable reproductive aging and novel pleiotropic gene.

Authors:  Masaoki Kohzaki; Akira Ootsuyama; Toshiyuki Umata; Ryuji Okazaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Introducing a quantitative method to calculate the rate of primary infertility.

Authors:  Mm Akhondi; K Kamali; F Ranjbar; S Shafeghati; Z Behjati Ardakani; M Shirzad; M Eslamifar; K Mohammad; M Parsaeian
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 1.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.