OBJECTIVES: Most clinical laboratories replaced their manual precipitation techniques for the determination of urinary protein with automated dye binding assays or benzethonium chloride-turbidimetric assays. Few studies have validated these assays for the measurement of urinary proteins in the normal range. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study compares four automated assays for the measurement of urinary protein to a manual Ponceau S/TCA precipitation assay. We evaluated the linearity, the precision, the analytical sensitivity, the accuracy and the recovery of different proteins for each assay. RESULTS: All assays showed good linearity with the theoretical concentration of albumin present in the sample. The coefficient of variation was below 10% at a concentration of 0.142 g/L. However, the manual Ponceau S/TCA assay demonstrated superior analytical sensitivity. Accuracy determinations showed a variable positive bias and poor correlations at concentrations below 0.1 g/L when compared to the Ponceau S/TCA assay. Small molecular weight peptides particularly affected the pyrogallol red assays but other urinary components also interfered with the automated assays. CONCLUSIONS: Most automated assays show high imprecision and poor accuracy for the measurement of urinary protein in the normal range. The Ponceau S/TCA offers a precise and accurate manual alternative to these automated assays.
OBJECTIVES: Most clinical laboratories replaced their manual precipitation techniques for the determination of urinary protein with automated dye binding assays or benzethonium chloride-turbidimetric assays. Few studies have validated these assays for the measurement of urinary proteins in the normal range. DESIGN AND METHODS: This study compares four automated assays for the measurement of urinary protein to a manual Ponceau S/TCA precipitation assay. We evaluated the linearity, the precision, the analytical sensitivity, the accuracy and the recovery of different proteins for each assay. RESULTS: All assays showed good linearity with the theoretical concentration of albumin present in the sample. The coefficient of variation was below 10% at a concentration of 0.142 g/L. However, the manual Ponceau S/TCA assay demonstrated superior analytical sensitivity. Accuracy determinations showed a variable positive bias and poor correlations at concentrations below 0.1 g/L when compared to the Ponceau S/TCA assay. Small molecular weight peptides particularly affected the pyrogallol red assays but other urinary components also interfered with the automated assays. CONCLUSIONS: Most automated assays show high imprecision and poor accuracy for the measurement of urinary protein in the normal range. The Ponceau S/TCA offers a precise and accurate manual alternative to these automated assays.
Authors: Derek M Fine; Martina Ziegenbein; Michelle Petri; Ernest C Han; Alison M McKinley; Jerry W Chellini; Haikady N Nagaraja; Kathryn A Carson; Brad H Rovin Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Dane A De Silva; Anne C Halstead; Anne-Marie Côté; Yasser Sabr; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura A Magee Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 3.007