Literature DB >> 15820645

Active processing of biological motion perception: an ERP study.

Masahiro Hirai1, Atsushi Senju, Hirokata Fukushima, Kazuo Hiraki.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to measure event-related potentials (ERPs) to clarify how attention affects neural activity during the visual perception of biological motion (BM). Thirteen healthy subjects observed BM or scrambled motion (SM). For SM, each point had the same velocity vector as in BM, but the initial starting positions were randomized. Each BM and SM was overlaid with ten noise dots and four rectangles. For the rectangles, one was or was not rotated 90 degrees relative to the others. Subjects were required to undertake two kinds of visual tasks. For the attention-to-motion condition, subjects directed their attention to the type of motion. For the attention-to-rectangle condition, subjects directed their attention to the rotational angle of the overlaid rectangles. As in our earlier study, the ERP response to the perception of BM had two negative components at approximately 200 ms (N200) and approximately 330 ms (N330) in both attentional conditions. Our analysis focused on the amplitude of the second negative component, which was sensitive to BM. There was a significant interaction between attention and the type of motion regarding the amplitude of N330. Specifically, the amplitude of N330 in response to BM was greater in the attention-to-motion condition than in the attention-to-rectangle condition, and was greater than the amplitude of the response to SM in the attention-to-motion condition. These results suggest that in this experimental design, processing of BM is modulated by attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820645     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  12 in total

1.  The developmental trajectory of pointing perception in the first year of life.

Authors:  Annika M D Melinder; Carolien Konijnenberg; Tone Hermansen; Moritz M Daum; Gustaf Gredebäck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Event-related potentials index neural response to eye contact.

Authors:  Adam J Naples; Jia Wu; Linda C Mayes; James C McPartland
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.251

3.  The role of spatial and temporal information in biological motion perception.

Authors:  Joachim Lange; Markus Lappe
Journal:  Adv Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-07-15

4.  Direction of Biological Motion Affects Early Brain Activation: A Link with Social Cognition.

Authors:  Alan John Pegna; Elise Gehring; Georg Meyer; Marzia Del Zotto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Neural rhythmic symphony of human walking observation: Upside-down and Uncoordinated condition on cortical theta, alpha, beta and gamma oscillations.

Authors:  David Zarka; Carlos Cevallos; Mathieu Petieau; Thomas Hoellinger; Bernard Dan; Guy Cheron
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-18

6.  The neurophysiology of biological motion perception in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Carol Jahshan; Jonathan K Wynn; Kristopher I Mathis; Michael F Green
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 2.708

7.  Sight restoration after congenital blindness does not reinstate alpha oscillatory activity in humans.

Authors:  Davide Bottari; Nikolaus F Troje; Pia Ley; Marlene Hense; Ramesh Kekunnaya; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Observation of Point-Light-Walker Locomotion Induces Motor Resonance When Explicitly Represented; An EEG Source Analysis Study.

Authors:  Alberto Inuggi; Claudio Campus; Roberta Vastano; Ghislain Saunier; Alejo Keuroghlanian; Thierry Pozzo
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-03-12

9.  Differential orientation effect in the neural response to interacting biological motion of two agents.

Authors:  Masahiro Hirai; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Event-related alpha suppression in response to facial motion.

Authors:  Christine Girges; Michael J Wright; Janine V Spencer; Justin M D O'Brien
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.