Literature DB >> 15820551

Measuring emotional processes in animals: the utility of a cognitive approach.

Elizabeth S Paul1, Emma J Harding, Michael Mendl.   

Abstract

Contemporary researchers regard emotional states as multifaceted, comprising physiological, behavioural, cognitive and subjective components. Subjective, conscious experience of emotion can be inferred from linguistic report in humans, but is inaccessible to direct measurement in non-human animals. However, measurement of other components of emotion is possible, and a variety of methods exist for monitoring emotional processes in animals by measuring behavioural and physiological changes. These are important tools, but they have limitations including difficulties of interpretation and the likelihood that many may be sensitive indicators of emotional arousal but not valence-pleasantness/unpleasantness. Cognitive components of emotion are a largely unexplored source of information about animal emotions, despite the fact that cognition-emotion links have been extensively researched in human cognitive science indicating that cognitive processes-appraisals of stimuli, events and situations-play an important role in the generation of emotional states, and that emotional states influence cognitive functioning by inducing attentional, memory and judgement biases. Building on this research, it is possible to design non-linguistic cognitive measures of animal emotion that may be especially informative in offering new methods for assessing emotional valence (positive as well as negative), discriminating same-valenced emotion of different types, identifying phenotypes with a cognitive predisposition to develop affective disorders, and perhaps shedding light on the issue of conscious emotional experiences in animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820551     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  149 in total

Review 1.  An integrative and functional framework for the study of animal emotion and mood.

Authors:  Michael Mendl; Oliver H P Burman; Elizabeth S Paul
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  A glass full of optimism: enrichment effects on cognitive bias in a rat model of depression.

Authors:  Sophie Helene Richter; Anita Schick; Carolin Hoyer; Katja Lankisch; Peter Gass; Barbara Vollmayr
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Do horses with poor welfare show 'pessimistic' cognitive biases?

Authors:  S Henry; C Fureix; R Rowberry; M Bateson; M Hausberger
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2017-01-12

4.  Heart rate modulation in bystanding geese watching social and non-social events.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Isabella B R Scheiber; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  To Regulate or Not to Regulate? The Future of Animal Ethics in Experimental Research with Insects.

Authors:  Christopher B Freelance
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Negative emotional contagion and cognitive bias in common ravens (Corvus corax).

Authors:  Jessie E C Adriaense; Jordan S Martin; Martina Schiestl; Claus Lamm; Thomas Bugnyar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dopamine is released in the striatum during human emotional processing.

Authors:  Rajendra D Badgaiyan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 8.  Use of cognitive bias as a welfare tool in poultry.

Authors:  Ľubor Košťál; Zuzana Skalná; Katarína Pichová
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Pair-bonding influences affective state in a monogamous fish species.

Authors:  Chloé Laubu; Philippe Louâpre; François-Xavier Dechaume-Moncharmont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Emotion in animal contests.

Authors:  Andrew Crump; Emily J Bethell; Ryan Earley; Victoria E Lee; Michael Mendl; Lucy Oldham; Simon P Turner; Gareth Arnott
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.