Literature DB >> 15820518

Eccentricity effects on lateral interactions.

Revital Shani1, Dov Sagi.   

Abstract

We attempted to resolve an apparent conflict between the lack of psychophysical evidence of collinear facilitation at the near-periphery and physiological evidence from the monkey showing collinear effects extra-fovealy. We compared collinear and orthogonal configurations to discount facilitation due to reduced positional uncertainty. Detection thresholds were measured for Gabor targets at eccentricities of 0 degrees - 4 degrees, flanked by collinear or orthogonal flankers. Like in previous reports in the literature, results varied among subjects when the stimulus position was off-fixation. We found reduced facilitation at eccentricities as small as 1 degrees - 2 degrees. Moreover, facilitation did not increase when the stimuli were M-scaled or when observers received more practice. However, a larger proportion of subjects showed collinear facilitation when attention was directed to the tested configurations. The results suggest that differences in allocation of attention along the visual field may affect the underlying lateral interactions, consequently resulting in eccentricity effects as well as inter-observer variability.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820518     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Collinear facilitation is largely uncertainty reduction.

Authors:  Yury Petrov; Preeti Verghese; Suzanne P McKee
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Learning to link visual contours.

Authors:  Wu Li; Valentin Piëch; Charles D Gilbert
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Psychometric functions for detection and discrimination with and without flankers.

Authors:  Miguel A García-Pérez; Rocío Alcalá-Quintana; Russell L Woods; Eli Peli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  An exploration of the spatial scale over which orientation-dependent surround effects affect contour detection.

Authors:  Jennifer F Schumacher; Christina F Quinn; Cheryl A Olman
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Visual learning with reduced adaptation is eccentricity-specific.

Authors:  Hila Harris; Dov Sagi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Suppressive lateral interactions at parafoveal representations in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Arezoo Pooresmaeili; Jose L Herrero; Matthew W Self; Pieter R Roelfsema; Alexander Thiele
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Reducing crowding by weakening inhibitory lateral interactions in the periphery with perceptual learning.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Andrea Pavan; Luigi F Cuturi; Gianluca Campana; Giovanni Sato; Clara Casco
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Collinear search impairment is luminance contrast invariant.

Authors:  Chia-Huei Tseng; Hiu Mei Chow; Jiayu Liang; Satoshi Shioiri; Chien-Chung Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Collinear stimuli induce local and cross-areal coherence in the visual cortex of behaving monkeys.

Authors:  Ariel Gilad; Elhanan Meirovithz; Amir Leshem; Amos Arieli; Hamutal Slovin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The development of contour processing: evidence from physiology and psychophysics.

Authors:  Gemma Taylor; Daniel Hipp; Alecia Moser; Kelly Dickerson; Peter Gerhardstein
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.