| Literature DB >> 15820517 |
Susan J Leat1, Gloria Omoruyi, Andrew Kennedy, Ed Jernigan.
Abstract
This study compares the effectiveness of various image enhancement filters for improving the perceived visibility of coloured digital natural images for people with visual impairment. Generic filters were compared with Peli's adaptive enhancement and adaptive thresholding and custom-devised filters based on each subject's contrast sensitivity loss. Subjects with low vision made within filter rankings followed by between filter ratings. In general, subjects preferred filters with lower gains. Unsharp masking resulted in a significant increase in perceived visibility for some image types (p < or = 0.05) while Peli's adaptive enhancement, edge enhancement and histogram equalization resulted in borderline improvements. Adaptive thresholding and the custom devised filter did not result in overall improvements in perceived visibility.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 15820517 DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vision Res ISSN: 0042-6989 Impact factor: 1.886