BACKGROUND: No universally accepted method to measure professionalism exists. We developed an instrument to measure specific aspects of professionalism in surgical residents. METHODS: Professionalism was deconstructed into 15 domains. Behavioral descriptors were determined for extreme and selected intermediate anchors. It became evident that residents could "go too far" in some professional behaviors. Therefore, although a 7-point continuous ordinal scale forms the framework, a score of 7 does not necessarily indicate the ideal. This characteristic minimizes the problem of inflated ratings. RESULTS: The instrument was utilized by attending faculty to evaluate residents and also by residents as a self-evaluation. Calculated from ordinal values, mean (SD) of the ratings across domains for faculty evaluations of residents was 4.95 (0.38) while mean for self-evaluations was 4.95 (0.39). Reliability was high (coefficient alpha 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: This instrument provides a means to measure professional behaviors during surgical residency. Repeated use will be required to thoroughly establish validity and reliability.
BACKGROUND: No universally accepted method to measure professionalism exists. We developed an instrument to measure specific aspects of professionalism in surgical residents. METHODS: Professionalism was deconstructed into 15 domains. Behavioral descriptors were determined for extreme and selected intermediate anchors. It became evident that residents could "go too far" in some professional behaviors. Therefore, although a 7-point continuous ordinal scale forms the framework, a score of 7 does not necessarily indicate the ideal. This characteristic minimizes the problem of inflated ratings. RESULTS: The instrument was utilized by attending faculty to evaluate residents and also by residents as a self-evaluation. Calculated from ordinal values, mean (SD) of the ratings across domains for faculty evaluations of residents was 4.95 (0.38) while mean for self-evaluations was 4.95 (0.39). Reliability was high (coefficient alpha 0.85). CONCLUSIONS: This instrument provides a means to measure professional behaviors during surgical residency. Repeated use will be required to thoroughly establish validity and reliability.
Authors: April D Armstrong; Julie Agel; Matthew D Beal; Michael S Bednar; Michelle S Caird; James E Carpenter; Stuart T Guthrie; Paul Juliano; Matthew Karam; Dawn LaPorte; J Lawrence Marsh; Joshua C Patt; Terrance D Peabody; Karen Wu; David F Martin; John J Harrast; Ann E Van Heest Journal: JB JS Open Access Date: 2020-11-23
Authors: Gary L Malakoff; Catherine L Payne; Lisa J Staton; Victor O Kolade; Mukta Panda Journal: J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Date: 2014-04-14