Literature DB >> 15820297

Carvedilol reduces the costs of medical care in severe heart failure: an economic analysis of the COPERNICUS study applied to the United Kingdom.

Simon Stewart1, John J V McMurray, Ansgar Hebborn, Andrew J S Coats, Milton Packer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of carvedilol on the costs related to the treatment of severe chronic heart failure (CHF).
METHODS: Costs for the treatment for heart failure within the National Health Service (NHS) in the United Kingdom (UK) were applied to resource utilisation data prospectively collected in all patients randomized into the Carvedilol Prospective Randomized Cumulative Survival (COPERNICUS) Study. Unit-specific, per diem (hospital bed day) costs were used to calculate expenditures due to hospitalizations. We also included costs of carvedilol treatment, general practitioner surgery/office visits, hospital out-patient clinic visits and nursing home care based on estimates derived from validated patterns of clinical practice in the UK.
RESULTS: The estimated cost of carvedilol therapy and related ambulatory care for the 1156 patients assigned to active treatment was pound530,771 ( pound44.89 per patient/month of follow-up). However, patients assigned to carvedilol were hospitalised less often and accumulated fewer and less expensive days of admission. Consequently, the total estimated cost of hospital care was pound3.49 million in the carvedilol group compared with pound4.24 million for the 1133 patients in the placebo arm. The cost of post-discharge care was also less in the carvedilol than in the placebo group ( pound479,200 vs. pound548,300). Overall, the cost per patient treated in the carvedilol group was pound3948 compared to pound4279 in the placebo group. This equated to a cost of pound385.98 vs. pound434.18, respectively, per patient/month of follow-up: an 11.1% reduction in health care costs in favour of carvedilol.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that not only can carvedilol treatment increase survival and reduce hospital admissions in patients with severe CHF but that it can also cut costs in the process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820297     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  6 in total

Review 1.  Specialist nurse management programmes: economic benefits in the management of heart failure.

Authors:  Simon Stewart; John D Horowitz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Economic burden of heart failure in the elderly.

Authors:  Lawrence Liao; Larry A Allen; David J Whellan
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  The problem of polypharmacy in heart failure.

Authors:  Markus Flesch; Erland Erdmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Carvedilol: a review of its use in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Blair Jarvis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Meaghan Lunney; Marinella Ruospo; Patrizia Natale; Robert R Quinn; Paul E Ronksley; Ioannis Konstantinidis; Suetonia C Palmer; Marcello Tonelli; Giovanni Fm Strippoli; Pietro Ravani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-02-27

6.  Cost-effectiveness of eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms.

Authors:  Dawn Lee; Koo Wilson; Ron Akehurst; Martin R Cowie; Faiez Zannad; Henry Krum; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; John Vincent; Bertram Pitt; John J V McMurray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 5.994

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.