Literature DB >> 15820268

Is low mood an adaptation? Evidence for subtypes with symptoms that match precipitants.

Matthew C Keller1, Randolph M Nesse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although severe depression is dysfunctional, the capacity to experience normal low mood may be useful in certain fitness-threatening situations. Moreover, if specific kinds of situations recurred often enough in the course of evolution, natural selection may have shaped partially differentiated subtypes of low mood that are parallel to the subtypes of anxiety that protect against different kinds of danger. To test this hypothesis, we examined how symptoms of low mood differ depending upon the precipitating situation, and whether these differences match expectations of symptoms useful in each kind of situation.
METHOD: 337 subjects who experienced a period of low mood within the last year wrote accounts describing perceived causes of their low mood and they filled out the CES-D depression inventory. Seven symptom scales were derived from analysis of CES-D data. Independent judges blindly coded the accounts into one of six precipitant categories.
RESULTS: Different untoward situations were associated with different symptoms that were predicted to be useful in those situations. Social losses (death of a loved one, romantic breakups, and social isolation) were associated with greater crying and arousal. Failure to reach a goal, stress, and winter seasons were associated with more fatigue and pessimism. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that natural selection shaped not only a generic state of low mood but also partially differentiated subtypes shaped to cope with specific situations that were associated with fitness losses among our ancestors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820268     DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2004.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  26 in total

1.  First principles of Hamiltonian medicine.

Authors:  Bernard Crespi; Kevin Foster; Francisco Úbeda
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Depression as sickness behavior? A test of the host defense hypothesis in a high pathogen population.

Authors:  Jonathan Stieglitz; Benjamin C Trumble; Melissa Emery Thompson; Aaron D Blackwell; Hillard Kaplan; Michael Gurven
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 7.217

3.  Genetic and environmental influences on the codevelopment among borderline personality disorder traits, major depression symptoms, and substance use disorder symptoms from adolescence to young adulthood.

Authors:  Marina A Bornovalova; Brad Verhulst; Troy Webber; Matt McGue; William G Iacono; Brian M Hicks
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2017-04-19

4.  Follow your heart: Emotion adaptively influences perception.

Authors:  Jeanine K Stefanucci; Kyle T Gagnon; David A Lessard
Journal:  Soc Personal Psychol Compass       Date:  2011-06

5.  Robust symptom networks in recurrent major depression across different levels of genetic and environmental risk.

Authors:  H M van Loo; C D Van Borkulo; R E Peterson; E I Fried; S H Aggen; D Borsboom; K S Kendler
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-10-29       Impact factor: 4.839

6.  TARGETED REJECTION PREDICTS HASTENED ONSET OF MAJOR DEPRESSION.

Authors:  George M Slavich; Tiffany Thornton; Leandro D Torres; Scott M Monroe; Ian H Gotlib
Journal:  J Soc Clin Psychol       Date:  2009-02-01

7.  Depression is not a consistent syndrome: An investigation of unique symptom patterns in the STAR*D study.

Authors:  Eiko I Fried; Randolph M Nesse
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.839

8.  Circadian rhythms of psychomotor vigilance, mood, and sleepiness in the ultra-short sleep/wake protocol.

Authors:  Christopher E Kline; J Larry Durstine; J Mark Davis; Teresa A Moore; Tina M Devlin; Shawn D Youngstedt
Journal:  Chronobiol Int       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.877

9.  Depression is more than the sum score of its parts: individual DSM symptoms have different risk factors.

Authors:  E I Fried; R M Nesse; K Zivin; C Guille; S Sen
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2013-12-02       Impact factor: 7.723

Review 10.  Evolutionary mechanisms for loneliness.

Authors:  John T Cacioppo; Stephanie Cacioppo; Dorret I Boomsma
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2013-09-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.