Literature DB >> 15820013

Stem cell research, personhood and sentience.

Lisa Bortolotti1, John Harris.   

Abstract

In this paper the permissibility of stem cell research on early human embryos is defended. It is argued that, in order to have moral status, an individual must have an interest in its own wellbeing. Sentience is a prerequisite for having an interest in avoiding pain, and personhood is a prerequisite for having an interest in the continuation of one's own existence. Early human embryos are not sentient and therefore they are not recipients of direct moral consideration. Early human embryos do not satisfy the requirements for personhood, but there are arguments to the effect that they should be treated as persons nonetheless. These are the arguments from potentiality, symbolic value and the principle of human dignity. These arguments are challenged in this paper and it is claimed that they offer us no good reason to believe that early human embryos should be treated as persons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15820013     DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62210-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  3 in total

1.  The ethics of moral compromise for stem cell research policy.

Authors:  Zubin Master; G K D Crozier
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2012-03

2.  Stem cell research on embryonic persons is just.

Authors:  Aaron Rizzieri
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 3.  How and Why to Replace the 14-Day Rule.

Authors:  Sarah Chan
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2018-07-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.