Literature DB >> 15819668

Analytical and clinical sensitivity of West Nile virus RNA screening and supplemental assays available in 2003.

M P Busch1, L H Tobler, J Saldanha, S Caglioti, V Shyamala, J M Linnen, J Gallarda, B Phelps, R I F Smith, M Drebot, S H Kleinman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transfusion-transmitted West Nile virus (WNV) infections were first reported in 2002, which led to rapid development of investigational nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT). A study was conducted to evaluate sensitivities of WNV screening and supplemental NAT assays first employed in 2003. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-five member-coded panels were distributed to NAT assay manufacturers. Panels included five pedigreed WNV standards (1, 3, 10, 30, and 100 copies/mL), 15 or 16 donor units with very-low-level viremia identified through 2003 screening, and four or five negative control samples. Samples were tested neat in 10 replicates by all assays; for NAT screening assays, 10 replicates were also performed on dilutions consistent with minipool (MP)-NAT. The viral load distribution for 142 MP-NAT yield donations was characterized, relative to the analytical sensitivity of MP-NAT systems.
RESULTS: Analytical sensitivities (50% limits of detection [LoD] based on Poisson model of detection of WNV standards) for screening NAT assays ranged from 3.4 to 29 copies per mL; when diluted consistent with MP pool sizes, the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays was reduced to 43 to 309 copies per mL. Analytical sensitivity of supplemental assays ranged from 1.5 to 7.7 copies per mL (50% LoD). Detection of RNA in donor units varied consistent with analytical LoD of assays. Detection of low-level viremia after MP dilutions was particularly compromised for seropositive units, probably reflecting lower viral loads in the postseroconversion phase. Based on the viral load distribution of MP-NAT yield donations (median, 3519 copies/mL; range, < 50-690,000), 13 to 24 percent of units had viral loads below the 50 percent LoD of screening NAT assays run in MP-NAT format.
CONCLUSION: WNV screening and supplemental assays had generally excellent analytical sensitivity, comparable to human immunodeficiency virus-1 and hepatitis C virus NAT assays. The presence of low-level viremic units during epidemic periods and the impact of MP dilutions on sensitivity, however, suggest the need for further improvements in sensitivity as well as a role for targeted individual-donation NAT in epidemic regions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15819668     DOI: 10.1111/j.0041-1132.2005.04382.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  12 in total

Review 1.  West Nile virus in the transfusion setting with a special focus on Italian preventive measures adopted in 2008-2012 and their impact on blood safety.

Authors:  Simonetta Pupella; Giulio Pisani; Karen Cristiano; Liviana Catalano; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 2.  Molecular virology in transfusion medicine laboratory.

Authors:  Daniel Candotti; Jean-Pierre Allain
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  West Nile virus nucleic acid persistence in whole blood months after clearance in plasma: implication for transfusion and transplantation safety.

Authors:  Marion C Lanteri; Tzong-Hae Lee; Li Wen; Zhanna Kaidarova; Marjorie D Bravo; Nancy E Kiely; Hany T Kamel; Leslie H Tobler; Philip J Norris; Michael P Busch
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.157

4.  Defining the levels of secreted non-structural protein NS1 after West Nile virus infection in cell culture and mice.

Authors:  Kyung Min Chung; Michael S Diamond
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.327

5.  Establishment of an Algorithm Using prM/E- and NS1-Specific IgM Antibody-Capture Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays in Diagnosis of Japanese Encephalitis Virus and West Nile Virus Infections in Humans.

Authors:  Jedhan U Galula; Gwong-Jen J Chang; Shih-Te Chuang; Day-Yu Chao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Progress on the development of therapeutics against West Nile virus.

Authors:  Michael S Diamond
Journal:  Antiviral Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.970

7.  West Nile virus infections projected from blood donor screening data, United States, 2003.

Authors:  Michael P Busch; David J Wright; Brian Custer; Leslie H Tobler; Susan L Stramer; Steven H Kleinman; Harry E Prince; Celso Bianco; Gregory Foster; Lyle R Petersen; George Nemo; Simone A Glynn
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 8.  A review of the epidemiological and clinical aspects of West Nile virus.

Authors:  Timothy J Gray; Cameron E Webb
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2014-04-11

9.  Development of a double antibody sandwich ELISA for West Nile virus detection using monoclonal antibodies against non-structural protein 1.

Authors:  Xi-Xia Ding; Xiao-Feng Li; Yong-Qiang Deng; Yong-Hui Guo; Wei Hao; Xiao-Yan Che; Cheng-Feng Qin; Ning Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Neuroinvasive West Nile Infection Elicits Elevated and Atypically Polarized T Cell Responses That Promote a Pathogenic Outcome.

Authors:  Eddie A James; Theresa J Gates; Rebecca E LaFond; Shinobu Yamamoto; Chester Ni; Duy Mai; Vivian H Gersuk; Kimberly O'Brien; Quynh-Anh Nguyen; Brad Zeitner; Marion C Lanteri; Philip J Norris; Damien Chaussabel; Uma Malhotra; William W Kwok
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 6.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.